期刊文献+

高校学生评教的影响因素与提升策略

下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章首先阐述了高校学生评教的影响因素,然后给出了高校学生评教的提升策略,包括完善学生评教制度、构建科学合理的学生评教指标体系、提高学生的评教思想认识、科学地运用学生评教反馈结果。
机构地区 安阳师范学院
出处 《西部素质教育》 2020年第20期157-158,共2页 Western China Quality Education
基金 2019年度安阳师范学院校级教育教学改革研究与实践项目“基于DEA的高校学生评教因素分析及对策研究”(编号:ASJY-2019-CYB-026)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1胡祖莹,魏红.教学评价中信息来源的可靠性研究[J].教师教育研究,1996,11(3):38-43. 被引量:25
  • 2Feldman, K. A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and extenud (neutral) observers[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989,(30):113-135.
  • 3Marsh, H.W. Students' evaluations of university teaching:Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility[ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, ( 76 ) :707-754.
  • 4Brandenburg, D. C., Slindle, J. A and Batista, E. E.Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1977,(7):67-78.
  • 5Centra, J. A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation[M]. Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1993.
  • 6Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R.P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.) Effective Teaching in Higher Education[ M]. New York: Agathon. 1997.241-320.
  • 7Feldman, K. A. Classsize and students' evaluations of college teacher and courses: A close look [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1984, (21) :45-116.
  • 8McKeachie, W. J. Student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997,(52) :1218-1225.
  • 9Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (52) : 1209-1217.
  • 10付八军,冯晓玲.高校教师教学评价研究综述[J].黑龙江高教研究,2008,26(4):78-80. 被引量:41

共引文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部