期刊文献+

使真者理论的兴起与当代批判——兼论盖梯尔问题的事实建构论方案 被引量:2

The Rise of Truthmaker Theory and its Contemporary Criticism: A Factual Constructivism Solution to the Gettier Problem
原文传递
导出
摘要 使真者理论是分析形而上学家解释真理问题的中心原则,它不仅为解释命题为何为真提供本体论地基,同时也对解决盖梯尔问题提供新思路。虽然使真者理论在当代分析哲学中是一个成熟的理论体系,但仍然有着深层问题,需要予以深入批评。这种批评的结果将导致,对使真者理论的理论内核进行改造,将事实视为认识论概念而非本体论概念,用事实建构论取代事实本体论,全面批判使真者理论。同时,事实建构论也为盖梯尔问题的解决提供更有效、合理的方案。 Truthmaker theory has become a central principle for realists’ interpretation of truth. It not only provides an ontological ground for true proposition but also provides ideas to solve the Gettier problem. But Truthmaker theory still has deep-seated problems and needs to be criticized. If we adopt factual constructivism, we can fully criticize Truthmaker theory and find effective solutions to the Gettier problem.
作者 阮凯 RUAN Kai(Institute of Philosophy,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai 200235,China)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第9期19-24,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“基于信息技术哲学的当代认识论研究”(15ZDB020)。
关键词 盖梯尔问题 知识合法性 事实本体论 事实建构论 分析形而上学 Gettier problem legitimacy of knowledge factual ontology factual constructivism analytic metaphysics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1布鲁士.罗素.立足于实用主义而非怀疑主义的关联主义[J].河北学刊,2004,24(6):56-62. 被引量:1
  • 2Audi, Robert, 1988, Belief, Justification, and Knowledge, Wadsworth.
  • 3Gettier, Edmund, 1963, "Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?" Analysis 23.
  • 4Goldman, Alvin, 1967, "A Causal Theory of Knowledge", Journal of Philosophy 64. 1976, "Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge", Journal of Philosophy 73.
  • 5Harman, Gilbert, 1968, "Knowledge, Inference, and Explanation", American Philosophical Quarterly 5. 1973, Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1981, "Reasoning and Evidence One does not Possess", Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 5.
  • 6Lehrer, Keith, 2000, Theory of Knowledge, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • 7Lehrer, Keith, and Thomas D. Paxson, Jr. , 1969, "Knowledge : Undefeated Justified True Belief", Journal of Philosophy 66.
  • 8Plantinga, Alvin, 1993, Warrant: The Current Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 9Pollock, John L. , 1956, Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • 10Searle, John, 1984, Minds, Brains and Science, Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.

共引文献38

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部