期刊文献+

胸腔积液中ADA、LDH诊断结核性和细菌性胸腔积液的临床价值 被引量:4

The clinical value of ADA and LDH in the Diagnosis of tuberculous and bacterial Hydrops in pleural Fluid
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胸腔积液中腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)诊断结核性和细菌性腔积液的临床价值。方法选取2015年6月—2019年6月在丹阳市人民医院接受治疗的90例胸腔积液患者为研究对象,根据最终出院诊断结果分为结核性胸腔积液组(n=31)、细菌性胸腔积液组(n=38)和肿瘤性胸腔积液组(n=21)。比较三组胸腔积液ADA、LDH水平,采用ROC曲线评估ADA、LDH诊断结核性、细菌性胸腔积液的效能。结果结核性胸腔积液组ADA水平高于细菌性胸腔积液组、肿瘤性胸腔积液组,差异显著(P<0.05);细菌性胸腔积液组LDH水平高于结核性胸腔积液组、肿瘤性胸腔积液组,差异显著(P<0.05)。ADA诊断结核性胸腔积液曲线下面积(AUC)为0.753,灵敏度、特异度分别为87.2%和62.9%;诊断细菌性胸腔积液AUC为0.511,灵敏度、特异度分别为29.3%和73.2%。LDH诊断结核性胸腔积液AUC为0.523,灵敏度、特异度分别为36.9%和67.8%;诊断细菌性胸腔积液AUC为0.801,灵敏度、特异度分别为89.1%和56.7%。结论不同类型的胸腔积液患者的胸腔积液ADA、LDH水平存在差异,ADA诊断结核性胸腔积液的效能优于LDH,LDH诊断细菌性胸腔积液的效能优于ADL。 Objective To explore the clinical value of pleural adenosine deaminase and lactate dehydrogenase in diagnosis of tuberculous and bacterial effusion in patients with pleural effusion.Methods 90 patients with pleural effusion who were treated in Danyang People's hospital from June 2015 to June 2019 were selected as subjects,the patients were divided into tuberculous pleural effusion group(n=31),bacterial pleural effusion group(n=38)and tumor pleural effusion group(n=21).The levels of ADA and LDH in pleural fluid in three groups were compared.The diagnostic efficacy of ADA and LDH in tuberculous and bacterial pleural effusion was evaluated by ROC curve.Results The level of ADA in tuberculous pleural effusion group was higher than that in bacterial pleural effusion group and tumor pleural effusion group(P<0.05),and the level of LDH in bacterial pleural effusion group was higher than that in tuberculous pleural effusion group and tumor pleural effusion group,the difference was significant(P<0.05).The area under the curve(AUC)of ADA was 0.753,and the sensitivity and specificity were 87.2%and 62.9%,respectively.The AUC of bacterial pleural effusion was 0.511,the sensitivity and specificity were 29.3%and 73.2%,respectively.The diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion AUC by LDH was 0.523,the sensitivity and specificity were 36.9%and 67.8%,respectively;Diagnosis of bacterial pleural effusion AUC was 0.801,the sensitivity and specificity were 89.1%and 56.7%.Conclusion The levels of ADA and LDH in different types of pleural effusion are different.ADA is better than LDH in diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion,and LDH is better than ADL in diagnosing bacterial pleural effusion.
作者 查丽芬 张腊娣 潘慧明 李倩 徐鑫祥 杨广惠 费湘平 马弘达 ZHA Lifen;ZHANG Nadi;PAN Huiming;LI Qian;XU Xinxiang;YANG Guanghui;FEI Xiangping;MA Hongda(Department of Respiratory Medicine,Danyang People's Hospital,Danyang Jiangsu 212300,China)
出处 《临床研究》 2020年第11期12-14,共3页 Clinical Research
关键词 腺苷脱氨酶 乳酸脱氢酶 胸腔积液 adenosine deaminase lactate dehydrogenase pleural effusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献64

  • 1Si-Biao Su,Shan-Yu Qin,Xiao-Yun Guo,Wei Luo,Hai-Xing Jiang.Assessment by meta-analysis of interferon-gamma for the diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(10):1645-1651. 被引量:18
  • 2叶军辉,马文江.胸水癌胚抗原升高在急性脓胸患者中的临床诊断价值[J].浙江医学,2004,26(8):630-631. 被引量:5
  • 3佟万成.溶血磷脂酸代谢途径及在炎症中的作用[J].国外医学(呼吸系统分册),1996,16(2):81-83. 被引量:1
  • 4童朝辉,王臻,王辰.内科胸腔镜技术及其临床应用[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(3):220-222. 被引量:86
  • 5Roper WH, Waring JJ. Primary seroflbrinous pleural effusion inmilitary personnel[J]. Am Rev Tuberc, 1955,71 (5) : 616-634.
  • 6Yew WW, Chan CY, Kwan SY, et al. Diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion by the detection of tuberculo estearic acid in pleural aspirates[J].Chest, 1991, 100(5): 1261-1263.
  • 7Escudero Bueno C, Garcia Clemente M, Cuesta Castro B, et al. Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope's needle. Study of 414 patients [J]. Arch Intern Med 1990, 150(6) : 1190-1194.
  • 8Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Holmes E. " Metabonomics " Understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysi-nlogieal stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data [ J ]. Xenobiotica, 1999, 29 (ll) : 1181-1189.
  • 9Lindon JC, Holmes E, Nicholson JK. Metabonomics techniques and applications to pharmaceutical research & development [ J ]. Pharm Res, 2006, 23(6) : 1075-1088.
  • 10Weiner J 3rd, Parida SK, Maertzdorf J, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation, immunosuppression and stress with active disease are revealed by metabolomic profiling of tuberculosis patients[ J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(7) : e40221. Z.

共引文献105

同被引文献44

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部