期刊文献+

运用ELISA对利妥昔单抗及其生物类似药在方法学上进行相似性验证 被引量:1

Method Validation of Methodology Similarity between Rituximab and Its Biosimilar by ELISA
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的验证受试品(抗人CD20嵌合单克隆抗体,biosimilar,B)与参比品(利妥昔单抗,rituximab,美罗华,reference,R)在方法学上的类似性。方法受试品和参比品的测定采用双抗夹心酶联免疫吸附分析法(ELISA),检测结果用Watson LIMSTM V.7.3.0.01(Thermo Scientific公司)软件进行处理,方法类似性比较采用均衡实验设计并用Allfit软件中平方和的统计方式比较标准曲线类似性,方法从准确度、精密度、特异性、灵敏度、选择性、稀释线性及稳定性等方面进行系统验证。结果受试品与参比品标准曲线平衡实验结果进行类似性比较,统计结果P=0.0507无统计学差异(P>0.05);系统性验证结果表明,受试品和参比品批内准确度和精密度分别在5.6%~7.7%,-9.0%^-0.8%内,受试品和参比品批间准确度和精密度分别在6.5%~7.2%,-7.3%^-3.2%内,受试品和参比品的总误差≤13.9%,满足方法学接受标准;选择性、特异性、稀释线性和稳定性在方法学接受范围内。结论经平衡实验设计和系统验证的ELISA法,满足生物类似物方法学接受标准,可用于利妥昔单抗生物类似药药动学研究。 OBJECTIVE To validate the methodology similarity of the biosimilar(recombinant anti-human CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody,B)and the reference(rituximab,R).METHODS The biosimilar and the reference were measured by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),and the concentration of the analytes were back-calculated with Watson LIMSTM V.7.3.0.01(Thermo Scientific Inc.).The comparison of similarity between B and T were investigated with a balanced experiment design,and the results of the standard curves were evaluated with a statistic method,square of sum,using the statistic tool,Allfit.Systematic validation of the method from accuracy,precision,specificity,sensitivity,selectivity,dilution linearity,and stability etc.aspects.RESULTS The results of the standard curves from the balanced designed experiments of the biosimilar and the reference were compared,and the statistical result was P=0.0507,which showed no significant statistic difference(P>0.05).The systematic validation results showed that the intra-assay accuracy and precision of the method between the biosimilar and the reference were within the range of 5.6%-7.7%and-9.0%--0.8%,respectively;the inter-assay accuracy and precision of the method between the B and the T were within the range of 6.5%-7.2%and-7.3%--3.2%,respectively;the total error of the method was not more than 13.9%,which met the methodological acceptance criteria.The results of selectivity,specificity,dilution linearity,and stability were within the acceptance criteria.CONCLUSION The ELISA method,which was systematically validated with the balanced experimental design meets the acceptance criteria of biosimilar methodology requirement,and could be used to support the pharmacokinetic study of rituximab and its biosimilar.
作者 王梦佳 董立厚 李弯弯 吕晓龙 王变珍 葛志强 WANG Meng-jia;DONG Li-hou;LI Wan-wan;Lü Xiao-long;WANG Bian-zhen;GE Zhi-qiang(School of Chemical Engineering and Technology,Tianjing University,Tianjin 300072,Chinn;Institute of Military Medicine,Academy of Military Sciences,Beijing 102206,China;United-Poiver Pharma Tech Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 102206,China)
出处 《中国药学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第19期1622-1628,共7页 Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 国家“重大新药创制”科技重大专项资助(2015ZX09501008)。
关键词 酶联免疫吸附分析法 单克隆抗体 生物类似药 利妥昔单抗 方法类似性验证 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay monoclonal antibody biosimilar rituximab methodology similarity validation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献6

共引文献14

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部