经皮微创闭合复位治疗踝关节骨折的临床疗效

Clinical Effect of Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Closed Reduction for Ankle Fracture

目的经皮微创闭合复位与切开复位内固定治疗踝关节骨折的临床疗效。方法2018年2月—2018年12月选取78例在本院踝关节骨折疾病就诊的患者作为调研对象。把患者分为2个小组,每组分得39例。对比组采用切开复位内固定治疗方式。试验组采用了经皮微创闭合复位治疗方式。分析两组最终的治疗结果。结果对比组骨折愈合时间和试验组相比较长,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对比组VAS评分和试验组相比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在踝关节骨折治疗中,经皮微创闭合复位方式应作为首选的治疗方式,与切开复位内固定治疗方式相对比,这种治疗方式可以缓解患者术后疼痛感,缩短愈合时间,此方式实施效果显著。

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive percutaneous reduction and open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of ankle fractures.Methods From February 2018 to December 2018,78 patients with ankle fracture in our hospital were selected as the research objects.The patients were divided into two groups with 39 cases in each group.The control group was treated with open reduction and internal fixation.The experimental group was treated with minimally invasive percutaneous reduction.The final treatment results of the two groups were analyzed.Results The fracture healing time of the control group was longer than that of the experimental group,the difference between the two groups was significant(P<0.05);the VAS score of the control group was higher than that of the experimental group,and the difference between the two groups was significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In the treatment of ankle fractures,percutaneous minimally invasive closed reduction should be the preferred treatment.Compared with open reduction and internal fixation,this treatment can relieve postoperative pain and shorten the healing time.