期刊文献+

利用后裔测定验证大白猪基因组选择实施效果研究 被引量:6

Using Progeny Testing to Evaluate the Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Large White Pigs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在通过测定基因组选择选留的大白公猪的后裔生产性能,探究基因组选择实际育种效果。本研究选用913头大白猪构建参考群体,利用ssGBLUP对新出生的823头大白公猪在去势前进行第一次基因组评估,待生产性能测定后进行第二次基因组评估,最终选留10头性能差异显著的公猪留种,比较其后代生长性状表型和育种值及综合选择指数差异。结果表明,两次基因组遗传评估,达100 kg体重日龄、100 kg活体背膘厚和总产仔数3个性状基因组育种值(GEBV)估计准确性分别由0.56、0.67和0.64提高至0.73、0.73和0.67,两次基因组选择基因组母系指数相关系数为0.82,表明在去势前进行公猪基因组选择具有较高的准确性,可实现种猪早期选择。根据各性状GEBV和基因组母系指数,10头公猪被划分为高、低生产性能组,后裔测定成绩表明,两组公猪后代100 kg体重日龄表型均值之差为2.58 d,育种值之差为3.08 d,100 kg活体背膘厚表型均值之差为1.15 mm,育种值之差为1.03 mm,综合母系指数均值之差为9.3,除后代100 kg体重日龄表型均值之差外,其他差异均达到极显著水平。本研究证明,在基因组评估中具有显著差异的公猪其后代在表型值和育种值等方面均存在显著差异,通过基因组选择能够挑选出优秀种公猪,可将其遗传优势传递给后代。 This study aimed to evaluate the actual genetic improvement effect of genomic selection in Large White boars through progeny testing in production performance. Nine hundred and thirteen Large White pigs were used to construct a reference group, and 823 new-born Large White boars were used to implement the first genomic selection through ssGBLUP before castration. The second genomic selection were carried out after performance testing, then 10 boars with significant difference in production performance were selected and their offsprings were compared in phenotypic values, estimated breeding values of growth traits and selection index. The results showed that the accuracies of genomic prediction on age at 100 kg body weight, 100 kg backfat thickness and total number born increased from 0.56, 0.67 and 0.64 in the first genomic selection to 0.73, 0.73 and 0.67 in the second genomic selection, respectively. The correlation coefficient of maternal selection index between the two genomic selection before castration and after performance testing was 0.82, which indicated that the first genomic selection before castration was accurate enough to make early selection on boars. According to the genomic breeding values and maternal selection index of 10 selected boars, two groups with high and low production performance were set up. The progeny testing showed that the difference of average phenotypic value between groups was 2.58 days, and the difference of average evaluated breeding value(EBV) between groups was 3.08 days in age at 100 kg body weight, those were 1.15 mm and 1.03 mm in 100 kg backfat thickness, respectively, and the difference in the mean of the comprehensive maternal index was 9.3, all the differences(except age at 100 kg body weight) were extremely significant. This study prove that the offspring of boars with significant differences in genomic evaluation have significant differences in phenotypic values and breeding values, which indicate that, through genomic selection, excellent breeding boars can be selected and their genetic superiority can be passed to their offsprings.
作者 周子文 付璐 孟庆利 周海深 张勤 丁向东 ZHOU Ziwen;FU Lu;MENG Qingli;ZHOU Haishen;ZHANG Qin;DING Xiangdong(Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics,Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Agriculture,National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding,College of Animal Science and Technology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China;Beijing Pig Breeding Center,Beijing 100194,China;College of Animal Science and Technology,Shandong Agricultural University,Taian 271018,China)
出处 《畜牧兽医学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期2367-2377,共11页 ACTA VETERINARIA ET ZOOTECHNICA SINICA
基金 国家生猪产业技术体系(CARS-35) 河北省重点研发计划(19226376D)。
关键词 基因组选择 大白猪 后裔测定 准确性 genomic selection Large White pig progeny testing accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献130

  • 1Goddard M E, Hayes B J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10:381-391.
  • 2Meuwissen T H E, Hayes B J, Goddard M E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001, 157:1819-1829.
  • 3Heffner E L, Sonells M E, Jannink J L. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci, 2009, 49:1-12.
  • 4Sonesson A K, Meuwissen T H. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41:37.
  • 5Habier D. More than a third of the WCGALP presentations on genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet, 2010, 127:336-337.
  • 6Goddard M E, Hayes B J. Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124:323-330.
  • 7Xu S. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics, 2003, 163:789-801.
  • 8Caius M P L. Genomic breeding value prediction: Methods and procedures. Animal, 2010, 4:157-164.
  • 9Verbyla K L, Hayes B J, Bowman P J, et al. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genet Res, 2009, 91:307-311.
  • 10Meuwissen T H. Accuracy of breeding values of 'nrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41:35.

共引文献98

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部