期刊文献+

超声引导下腹横筋膜平面阻滞复合全麻用于妇科腹腔镜手术的麻醉效果观察 被引量:8

Anesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with general anesthesia during gynecological laparoscopic surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察超声引导下腹横筋膜平面(TAP)阻滞复合全麻用于妇科腹腔镜手术的麻醉效果。方法 82例全麻下妇科腹腔镜手术治疗患者随机分为观察组和对照组,麻醉诱导后观察组于超声引导下行TAP阻滞,对照组注入等容量的生理盐水。观察两组恢复时间、芬太尼用量、疼痛程度、镇静程度和不良反应。结果观察组苏醒时间、拔管时间、排气时间均短于对照组,芬太尼用量少于对照组(P<0.01);术后2、24 h视觉模拟评分低于对照组(P<0.01)。两组Ramsay评分和不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超声引导下TAP阻滞复合全麻用于妇科腹腔镜手术安全、有效,可减轻疼痛,减少芬太尼用量。 Objective To observe the anesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane(TAP)block with general anesthesia during gynecological laparoscopic surgery(GLS).Methods Eighty-two GLS patients randomly received ultrasound-guided TAP block(observation group)or normal saline(control group)after anesthesia induction.The recovery time,fentanyl dosage,pain,sedation and adverse reactions were compared between two groups.Results Compared with control group,awakening,extubation and exhaust time,fentanyl dosage,and visual analogue scale at 2 h and 24 h were lower in observation group(P<0.01).There was no significant difference in Ramsay score and adverse reactions between two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Ultrasound-guided TAP block with general anesthesia is safe and effective for GLS by reducing pain and fentanyl dosage.
作者 杨伟才 凌睿 黄锋谟 YANG Wei-cai;LING Rui;HUANG Feng-mo(Lianjiang People's Hospital,Lianjiang 524400,China)
出处 《广东医科大学学报》 2020年第5期585-587,共3页 Journal of Guangdong Medical University
基金 湛江市非资助科技攻关计划项目(No.2019B01062)。
关键词 妇科腹腔镜手术 超声引导 腹横筋膜平面阻滞 全麻 gynecological laparoscopic surgery ultrasound guidance transversus abdominis plane general anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献83

  • 1Rozen WM,Tran TM,Ashton MW,et al.Refining the course of the thoracolumbar nerves:a new understanding of the innervation of the anterior abdominal wall[J].Clin Anat,2008,21(1):325-333.
  • 2Yuen PM,Yu KM,Yip SK,et al.A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1997,177(1):109-114.
  • 3Bisgaard T,Roscnberg J,Kehlet H.From acute to chronicpain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy:aprospectivefollowupanalysis[J].Scand J Gastroenterol,2005,40(11):1358-1364.
  • 4White PF.The changing role ofnon-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain[J].Anesth Analg,2005,101:s5-s22.
  • 5Walder B,Schafer M.Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled opioid analgesia for acute post-operative pain:aquantitativesystematic review[J].Acta Anesthesiol Scand,2001,45:795-804.
  • 6Abdallah FW,Laffey JG,Halpern SH,et al.Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transverse lower abdominal incisions:a meta-analysis[J].Br J Anaesth,2013,111(5):721-735.
  • 7Petersen PL, Stjernholm P, Kristiansen VB, et al. The bene- ficial effect of transversus abdominis plane block after laparo- seopic eholeeystectomy in day-case surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg, 2012, 115 (3) : 527-533.
  • 8Raft AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lum- bar triangle. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(10) : 1024-1026.
  • 9O'Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostateeto- my. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2006, 31(1):91. .
  • 10Petersen PL, Mathiesen O, Torup H, et al. The transversus abdominis plane block: a valuable option for postoperative analgesia? A topical review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2010, 54(5) : 529-535.

共引文献200

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部