期刊文献+

医药化工类专利申请创造性判断中反向教导的认定 被引量:1

Consideration of Opposite Teaching in Inventive Step Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文结合审查实践中的具体案例分析探讨了认定技术手段的效果缺陷是否构成反向教导时需要考量的要点,在此基础上,总结归纳得出该类发明的创造性评判策略,旨在为客观合理地进行创造性判断提供帮助。 Based on the analysis of specific cases in the practice of examination,this paper discusses the factors that need to be considered when Opposite Teaching of Technical Means with Defective Effects is applied to the judgment of inventive step.On this basis,it summarizes the evaluation strategies of this kind of invention,in order to provide help for the objective and reasonable judgment of inventive step.
作者 刘涛 杨佳倩 Liu Tao;Yang Jiaqian(Patent Examination Cooperation(Beijing)Center of the Patent Office,CNIPA,Beijing 100160,China)
出处 《广东化工》 CAS 2020年第17期83-84,共2页 Guangdong Chemical Industry
关键词 创造性 效果缺陷 技术手段 反向教导 inventive step defective effect technical means opposite teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部