期刊文献+

Review and Evaluation on the Sociocultural Theory and Bottleneck Hypothesis 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Over the past three decades,a growing number of different theories in second language acquisition field have come out in an effort to provide explanations as to how language learning takes place,to figure out what variables are effective for second language acquisition as well as to offer guidance to mass second language learners and language teachers.Because behind every teaching approach exists certain kind of theory of language acquisition and good theory in turn can help students master language skills in an effective and efficient way.Each theory is considered to have contributed to the field by highlighting a specific aspect of the language acquisition process.Second language acquisition theories are intrinsically related with various disciplines such as applied linguistics,psychology,education,sociolinguistics,neurology,etc.Considering the impossibility to elaborate all second language theories,I will focus on sociocultural theory and bottleneck hypothesis in second language acquisition.There is an overview which follows the introduction to the Sociocultural Theory and Bottleneck Hypothesis and its contribution to second language acquisition respectively,and then I will evaluate them to see their contributions to the SLA disciplinary development.
作者 Fan Xu
出处 《Review of Educational Theory》 2020年第4期58-63,共6页 教育理论综述(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献57

  • 1Adger, D. 2003. Core Syntax. A Minimalist Approach [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 2Canale, M. & M. Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing [J]. Applied Linguistics 1 : 1-47.
  • 3Clahsen, H. & C. Felser. 2006. Grammatical processing in language learners [J]. Applied Psycho- linguistics 27:3-42.
  • 4Clahsen, H., C. Felser, K. Neubauer, M. Sato & R. Silva. 2010. Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing [J]. Language Learning 60: 21-43.
  • 5Cook, V. 1996. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching (2nd edition) [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 6Dabrowska, E. 1997. The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists [J]. Linguistics 35: 735-766.
  • 7Dabrowska, E. &J. Street. 2006. Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers [J]. Language Sciences 28: 604-615.
  • 8DeKeyser, R. 1997. Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19:195-221.
  • 9DeKeyser, R. 2001. Automaticity and automatization [A]. In P. Robinson (ed.).Cognition and Second Language instruction [C]. New York:CUP. 125-151.
  • 10DeKeyser, R. 2005. What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues [J]. Language Learning 55: 1-25.

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部