期刊文献+

高职大学英语混合式分层教学实证研究——以苏州市职业大学为例 被引量:2

An Empirical Research on Blended Stratified English Teaching in Vocational Colleges:A Case Study of Suzhou Vocational University
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代高职教育需要培养有语言交际能力的应用型专业技术人才。高职学生生源多元化,宜实施分层教学。因此,有必要依托信息化教学手段,采用线上线下相结合的混合式模式,因材施教。以苏州某高校"大学英语"课程为例,探索并分析了混合式教学模式在英语教学中的运用,提出在具体实施过程中,要增加线上、线下教学的有机融合,注重发挥学生的主体作用,甄选合适的、优质的教学资源来优化教学效果。 Modern high vocational education is to cultivate qualified professional talents with verbal communicating skills.The diversity of students’ learning backgrounds calls for stratified teaching.Therefore,it is of necessity to adopt the blended online plus offline pattern with the support of information technology so as to suit every student fine.Taking college English teaching in a Suzhou-based vocational university as an example,this paper analyzes the application of blended model to English teaching and proposes that the integration of both online and offline teaching should be enhanced,students’ initiative encouraged,and appropriate and quality teaching resources selected to optimize teaching effectiveness.
作者 廖萍 LIAO Ping(School of Foreign Languages,Suzhou Vocational University,Suzhou 215104,China)
出处 《苏州市职业大学学报》 2020年第3期86-88,92,共4页 Journal of Suzhou Vocational University
基金 江苏开放大学办学体系“十三五”2019年度科研规划课题(19TXZC-07)。
关键词 高职教育 大学英语 混合式教学 分层教学 high vocational education college English blended teaching stratified teaching
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献69

  • 1王策三.论教师的主导作用和学生的主体地位[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1983(6):70-76. 被引量:145
  • 2黄月圆,顾曰国.以学生为中心,多维一体的大学英语教学法[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(2):9-13. 被引量:103
  • 3杜威.我的教育信条[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1996.
  • 4杨忠.培养技能 发展智能——外语教育工具性与人文性的统一[J].外语学刊,2007(6):133-137. 被引量:95
  • 5Larsen-Freeman, D. 2005. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring [M~. Bos- ton, MA:. Thomson Heinle.
  • 6Collins, J. & N. O'Brien (eds.). 2003. Greenwood Dictionary of Education ~-Z~. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • 7Hanten, G., X. Li, S. Chapman, P. Swank, J. Gamino, G. Roberson&H. Levin. 2007. De- velopment of verbal selective learning [J]. Developmental Neuropsychology 32 (1). 585-596.
  • 8Kirschner, P., J. Sweller & R. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, expe- riential, and inquiry-based teaching [J]. Educational Psychologist 4(2) : 75-86.
  • 9Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications I-M3. London: Longman.
  • 10Long, M. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of com- prehensible input [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:126-141.

同被引文献11

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部