分期付款买卖合同解除权之制度构造与定位--以最高人民法院第67号指导案例为切入点

System Construction and Location of the Right to Terminate the Installment Sale Contract--Taking the Supreme People’s Court Guiding Case No.67 as an Entry

《合同法》第167条的立法目的不能一概而论地认为是为了保护买受人的利益,应当用二分的眼光看待该问题,其既保护了买受人的利益也保护了出卖人的权益。通过体系解释,该款作为赋予出卖人法定解除权的条款,有增加催告条款与合理期限条款来限制解除权使用的必要性。最后,出卖人的解除权具有其独立的地位,结合《合同法》第94条第3款之规定适用,可以完善《民法典合同篇》的法定解除权体系。

The legislative purpose of Article 167 of the Contract Law cannot be generalized to protect the interests of the buyer,and the issue should be viewed in a dichotomy,which protects both the interests of the buyer and the rights of the seller.Through system interpretation,this paragraph,as a clause granting the seller the legal right to cancel,has the necessity of adding a reminder clause and a reasonable period clause to restrict the right of cancellation.Finally,the seller’s right to rescind has its independent status,and its use in conjunction with the provisions of Article 94,paragraph 3 can improve the statutory right to rescind system of the Contract Law.