云南和广西提出传染病干预措施状况

Status of proposing infectious disease intervention measures in Yunnan and Guangxi

目的使用提出干预措施的程度值分析云南和广西对传染病采取干预措施的程度,以评价两地区传染病工作应对措施的完善状况。方法收集2004—2017年云南和广西所有涉及传染病应对措施的公开信息和文献,采用提出干预措施的程度评判完善程度(0表示程度最差,100%表示程度最好)。并运用Spearman相关分析探讨完善程度数值与传染病发病率间的关系。结果云南提出干预措施的程度从2004年的16.21%快速增长到2005年的47.12%,之后持续下降到2017年的7.00%;广西提出干预措施的程度从2004年的23.99%下降到2017年的8.00%,其中2012年出现较小幅的提升后趋于平缓。云南与广西提出措施的程度与传染病发病率之间无统计学相关(云南r=-0.473,P=0.088>0.05;广西r=-0.198,P=0.517>0.05)。结论云南和广西应对传染病的干预措施需要继续保持或增强。

Objective Based on the degree value of proposing intervention measures,we analyze the improvement status of local interventions on infectious diseases in Yunnan and Guangxi provinces.Methods All related public information,documents or literature which were openly issued based on data of the infectious diseases surveillance system in the two provinces during 2004-2017 were searched and retrieved.One value designed by the team as“the degree value of proposing intervention measures(0 as the worst,100%as the best)”was used to analyze the improvement degree.The Spearman method was used to analyze the relationship between the above outcome and the incidence rate of infectious diseases.Results In Yunnan province,the degree value of proposing intervention measures got a rapid growth from 16.21%in 2004 to 47.12%in 2005,and then got a regular decrease until to 7.00%in 2017.In Guangxi province,the degree value of proposing intervention measures decreased from 23.99%in 2004 to 8.00%in 2017,with a small increase in 2012 and then changed slightly.In both of the two provinces,there were no relationship between the incidence rate of infectious diseases and the degree value of proposing intervention measures(Yunnan r=-0.473,P=0.088>0.05;Guangxi r=-0.198,P=0.517>0.05).Conclusion The improvement of interventions for infectious diseases needed to be kept or strengthened.