期刊文献+

乳腺腺体平均剂量2种测量数据处理方法的比较研究

Comparative Research on Two Methods of Measurement Data Processing for Average Glandular Dose
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对医用乳腺X射线辐射源AGD测量数据处理过程中存在的难点问题,进行了试验研究,提出了2种有效的数据处理方法:近值法和线性拟合法。经过试验和比较得到以下结论:2种数据处理方法获得的测量结果及不确定度均符合相关技术规范要求,满足3 U rel≤MPE的符合性判定准则。比较而言,线性拟合法获得的测量结果更加准确,其相对扩展不确定度(k=2)在5.7%~6.5%范围内,而近值法获得的相对扩展不确定度在6.4%~10%范围内。两种数据处理方法有效解决了医用乳腺X射线辐射源检定中不同模体厚度的转化因子和不同乳房成分修正因子如何确定的问题,为国家规程的下一步修订完善提供了参考,对其它同类测量数据的分析和处理也具有一定的借鉴作用。 Focusing on the difficulties that exist in the data processing of the AGD measurement of medical X-ray radiation source for mammographic equipment,two effective data processing methods were proposed:the nearest value method and the linear fitting method.Through test and comparison,the following conclusions were obtained:the measurement results and uncertainty obtained by the two data processing methods meet the requirements of relevant technical specifications,and satisfied the judge standard of 3 U rel≤MPE.In comparison,the measurement results obtained by linear fitting method are more accurate,its relative expanded uncertainty(k=2)is in the range of 5.7%~6.5%,while that obtained by the nearest value method is in the range of 6.4%~10%.The above two data processing methods can effectively solve the problem of how to determine the conversion factor of different phantom thickness and the correction factor of different breast components in the verification of medical breast X-ray radiation source,and provide some reference for the next revision and improvement of national regulations,and also have a certain reference for the analysis and processing of other similar measurement data.
作者 赵才贤 ZHAO Cai-xian(Guizhou Institute for Metrology&Calibration,Guiyang,Guizhou 550001,China)
出处 《计量学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期1297-1302,共6页 Acta Metrologica Sinica
关键词 计量学 乳腺X射线 平均腺体剂量 半值层 近值法 线性拟合法 不确定度 metrology mammography X-ray average glandular dose half-value layer nearest value method linear fitting method uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献35

  • 1韩奎初.测量照射量(空气比释动能)的空腔电离室[J].核标准计量与质量,1995,0(1):33-35. 被引量:3
  • 2秦维昌.主译.乳腺摄影质量控制手册.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.19—22.
  • 3Aminah M, Ng KH, Abdullah BJ, et al. Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast- to- noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2010, 33 : 329 -334.
  • 4Destouet JM, Bassett LW, Yaffe MJ, et al. The ACR's Mammography Accreditation Program: ten years of experience since MQSA. Am Coil Radiol,2005,2: 585-594.
  • 5Ranger NT, Lo JY, Samei E. A technique optimization protocol and the potential for dose reduction in digital mammography. Med Phys, 2010, 37:962-969.
  • 6Borg M, Badr I, Royle GJ. The use of a figure-of-merit (FOM) for optimization in digital mammography: a literature view. Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 2012, 151:81-88.
  • 7Thomson FJ. Automatic technique parameter selection on a digital mammography system: an evaluation of SNR and CNR as a function of AGD on a GE senographe DS. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med, 2006,29:251-256.
  • 8Williams MB, Raghunathan P, More MJ, et al. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Med Phys, 2008, 35:2414-2423.
  • 9Cunha DM, Tomal A, Poletti ME. Optimization of X-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol, 2012, 57:1919-1935.
  • 10Young KC, Oduko JM, Bosmans H, et al, Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. Br J Radiol, 2006, 79: 981-990.

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部