阮籍与郭象《庄子》注之异同

Similarities and Differences Between Ruan Ji's and Guo Xiang's Annotations to Zhuangzi

阮籍与郭象对《庄子》的理解的差异,反映出玄学发展从重《易》《老》到重《庄》的转折。郭象注《庄子》“逍遥”,美化当时的统治,这与阮籍强调自由、批判现实的态度不同。由于司马氏的高压政治,阮籍在仕隐上有矛盾心理;郭象批评隐士,则与他热衷权势有关。阮籍提出“无君论”,郭象化解了庄子对君主的批判,维护了君主存在的必要性。阮籍《达庄论》存在以《易》解《庄》的情况,郭象注《庄子》基本上摆脱了对《周易》的依靠。

The difference between Ruan Ji's and Guo Xiang’s understanding of Zhuangzi reflects the transition of Metaphysics from emphasizing Yi and Lao to Zhuang.Guo Xiang annotates"carefree"in Zhuangzi to beautify the rule at that time,which is different from Ruan Ji's attitude of emphasizing freedom and criticizing reality.Because of Sima’s high-pressure politics,Ruan Ji was ambivalent in his official career.Guo Xiang's criticism of hermits is related to his passion for power.Ruan Ji puts forward the theory of“no monarch”.Guo Xiang resolves Zhuangzi's criticism of the monarch and maintains the necessity of the existence of monarch.Ruan Ji's Da Zhuang Lun has the situation of interpreting Zhuang Zi with Yi.Guo Xiang's annotation of Zhuangzi has basically got rid of relying on Zhouyi.