期刊文献+

EV71与柯萨奇病毒A16细胞病变效应与病毒载量关系比较研究 被引量:1

A comparative study on the relationship between cytopathic effect and virus load of EV71 and CoxA16
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较EV71与柯萨奇病毒A16病毒载量与人横纹肌瘤细胞(RD)病变效应的关系。方法测定多株EV71和柯萨奇病毒A16毒株的半数培养感染量(TCID50);使用real-time PCR建立标准曲线,测定两类毒株分离液的病毒载量与每个TCID50单位相应的病毒载量。结果EV71和柯萨奇病毒A16毒株分离液病毒载量差异无统计学意义(t=-1.27,P=0.21);EV71毒株每个TCID50单位相应的核酸载量显著低于柯萨奇病毒A16毒株(t=4.29,P<0.01)。结论EV71与柯萨奇病毒A16感染人横纹肌瘤细胞产生的病毒颗粒总量无差异,正常病毒与缺陷病毒颗粒的相对量有明显差异,这可能是2种病毒致病性差异的原因之一。 Objective To compare the relationship between the cytopathic effect and virus load of EV71 and CoxA16 cultured in rhabdomyoma(RD)cells.Methods TCID50 of several EV71 and CoxA16 strains were detected.Real-time PCR was used to establish the standard curve to determine the viral load of the two strains isolates and the corresponding viral load of each TCID50 unit.Results There was no statistical significance on the difference in viral load between EV71 and Coxsackie virus A16 isolates(t=-1.27,P=0.21).The nucleic acid load per TCID50 unit of EV71 was significantly lower than that of Coxsackie Virus A16(t=4.29,P<0.01).Conclusion There is no difference on the total amount of virus particles produced by EV71 and Coxsackie virus A16 infected human rhabdomyoma cells,and the relative amount of normal virus and defective virus particles were significantly different,which may be one of the reasons for the difference in pathogenicity of the two viruses.
作者 崔海洋 王永全 吉彥莉 靳博 何燕 CUI Hai-yang;WANG Yong-quan;JI Yan-li;JIN Bo;HE Yan(Xicheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 100120,China;不详)
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2020年第19期2340-2342,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 肠道病毒71 柯萨奇病毒A16 致病性 人横纹肌瘤细胞培养 缺陷病毒 EV71 CoxA16 Pathogenicity Rhabdomyoma cell culture Defective virus
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献27

共引文献10

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部