摘要
在脱贫攻坚实践中,一些地方自觉不自觉地把扶贫标准拔高,甚至不同地区之间互相攀比看谁的标准高,对贫困户做了一些不切实际的承诺,设置的地方性考核指标明显超过了“两不愁三保障”标准。这些做法使得贫困户和非贫困户待遇差距太大,出现“悬崖效应”。一些地方对贫困村、贫困县的退出,规定了很多硬性的验收指标,验收指标也存在层层加码的问题,有些指标确实与“两不愁三保障”,以及基本公共服务主要领域指标接近全国平均水平没有太直接关系。这导致为了完成这些硬性指标,一些贫困县确实尽力而为,但是没有量力而行,甚至不惜举债搞贫困村建设,有的贫困村一次性就投入一两千万元资金,贫困村和非贫困村出现了“悬崖效应”。
In poverty elimination,some localities have intentionally or inadvertently raised their poverty thresholds,and some have even tried to compete with others in their standards,making irrational promises to impoverished households.As a result,their local assessment norms have come to exceed the national standards for basic living needs and for access to compulsory education,basic medical services and safe housing.This has led to an unreasonable gap between poverty-stricken households and other villagers,which is known as the“abyss consequence.”Some localities have set irrational standards for poverty elimination in poor villages and poor counties,while at each level the standards are raised in evaluation.This is irrelevant to the national standards for poverty elimination and to the main indicators of basic public services.To meet such mandated requirements,some poor counties try their best,but it is beyond their actual capacity.Some even borrow funds to support their poor villages.In the worst case,10 million to 20 million yuan has been invested in one poor village,thus creating an“abyss consequence”between poor villages and non-poor villages.
