期刊文献+

重大事件驱动下的美国情报监控政策立法演变及中国路径 被引量:5

EVOLUTION OF US INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE POLICY AND LEGISLATION DRIVEN BY MAJOR EVENTS AND CHINA S PATH
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新近披露的美国CIA窃听全球多国最高机密的监控事件,再度引发了各界对情报监控活动合法性边界的思考。美国是情报监控政策立法极为发达的国家,其改革具有突出的事件导向性特点。全面回顾美国情报监控典型政策立法脉络,有利于观察情报监控中"授权"与"限权"的博弈过程,对完善我国相关制度构建具有重要意义。建议我国完善情报监控流程、透明度、隐私保护等制度,构建科学、有效、可操作性强,具有中国特色的情报监控政策立法体系。 The recently disclosed US CIA eavesdropping most confidential surveillance events of many countries has caused community s thinking about the legal boundaries of intelligence surveillance activities again.The US is a country with highly developed intelligence surveillance policy and legislation,and its policy and legislative reforms have prominent event-oriented characteristics.A comprehensive review of the development of US intelligence surveillance policy and legislation is conducive to observing the process of‘authorization’and‘restriction of power’,and it is of great significance to improve China s related system.It is suggested that China should improve the intelligence surveillance process,transparency and privacy protection,and build intelligence surveillance policy and legislative system which is scientific,effective,operable and has Chinese characteristics.
作者 何治乐 孔华锋 He Zhile;Kong Huafeng(The Third Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security,Shanghai 201204,China;Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,Hubei,China)
出处 《计算机应用与软件》 北大核心 2020年第11期316-323,共8页 Computer Applications and Software
基金 公安理论及软科学研究计划项目(2019LLYJGASS048) 公安部第三研究所2020年基本科研业务费专项资金项目(C20251)。
关键词 国家安全 情报监控 透明度 隐私保护 区别对待 National security Intelligence surveillance Transparency Privacy protection Differential treatment
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献53

  • 1朱世达.“9·11”事件后美国的文化悖论[J].美国研究,2004,18(2):40-57. 被引量:10
  • 2Dean Sehabner, "Alaska Passes Anti-Patriot Act Resolution; Second State to Oppose Feds,"ABC News, May 23, 2003, http://abcnews. go. com/ sections/us/DailyNews.
  • 3http ://corprisk. timberlakepublishing, com/files/.
  • 4孔哲文.《美国民权遭千刀万剐》,《华盛顿观察》,2003年第7期(2003年2月19日),http://washingtonobserver.org/USPolitics.
  • 5"Patriot Act Ⅱ Also Limits the Public's Right-to-Know (Revised February 13, 2003),"OMB Watcher Vol. 4, No. 3 (Feb. 10, 2003), http://www. ombwatch. org/article/.
  • 6New York Times, Sep. 22, 2003. p.A. 16.
  • 7《爱国者法》.
  • 8Keith Fiels, "Resolution on The USA Patriot Act and Related Measures that Infringe on the Rights. of Library Users," http ://www. ala. org/ala/washoff.
  • 9"The Enemy within: Liberty and Security," The Economist, Oct. 9, 2004, p. 1.
  • 10Elaine Scarry, "Resolving to Resist," http://www. bostonreview. net/BR29.1/scarry.html.

共引文献60

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部