我国仲裁员任职制度的合理性分析与完善建议

The Rationality of Arbitrator Appointment System in China and Its Improvement

我国仲裁员任职制度主要涉及仲裁员法定资格与仲裁员名册两个问题。两者的背后隐含了同样的逻辑,即不相信当事人能够合理地选任仲裁员,事实上限制了当事人选任仲裁员的权利。这与目前主流的国际商事仲裁制度是相悖的,也不符合目前实践的发展。对此,完善我国仲裁员任职制度的途径就是借鉴世界主流国家的商事仲裁制度,对仲裁采取更为开放的态度,同时也要兼顾我国自身仲裁行业的发展实力和特点,设立否定式列举的仲裁员法定资格和推荐式的仲裁员名册制度。

Arbitrator appointment system mainly involves two issues:qualification and list of arbitrators.The underlying logic of both issues is the same,that is,the law maker does not believe that the parties can reasonably choose arbitrators.The limitation of the right to choose arbitrators is contrary to the current mainstream international commercial arbitration system and does not accord with the demand of current practice.Therefore,the way to improve Chinese arbitrator appointment system is to learn from the mainstream commercial arbitration system and to adopt a more open attitude to arbitration,and to consider the development and characteristics of Chinese own arbitration system.Setting up a negative list of arbitrators'legal qualification and adopting a recommended list of arbitrators are the right way for China to modify the arbitration law.