期刊文献+

基于GRADE系统的胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价的再评价 被引量:4

Reappraisal of Systematic Reviews of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Based on GRADE System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对胰高血糖素样肽1(GLP-1)受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的有效性和安全性的系统评价/Meta分析进行再评价,以期为临床应用该类药物治疗T2DM提供循证参考。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库和中国知网,搜集GLP-1受体激动剂治疗T2DM的系统评价/Meta分析,检索时限均为各数据库建库起至2019年12月。对符合纳入与排除标准的文献进行资料提取后,采用证据质量分级和推荐强度(GRADE)系统对纳入研究的证据质量等级进行评价,并对疗效和安全性的结局指标证据进行总结。结果:最终纳入31篇文献,结局指标共计91个,总体GRADE证据质量为中高质量,其中极低质量的结局指标有4个(4.4%),低质量的结局指标有33个(36.3%),中等质量的结局指标有45个(49.5%),高质量的结局指标有9个(9.9%)。证据总结表明,GLP-1受体激动剂降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的程度优于或类似于安慰剂和其他口服降糖药,优于二肽基肽酶(DPP-4)抑制剂;降低空腹血糖水平的程度优于或类似于安慰剂,优于其他口服降糖药和DPP-4抑制剂;引起低血糖的发生率与DDP-4类似,高于或类似于安慰剂,低于其他口服降糖药;引起腹泻、恶心的发生率高于其他口服降糖药、安慰剂和DPP-4抑制剂;引起呕吐的发生率高于其他口服降糖药和安慰剂。结论:GLP-1受体激动剂治疗T2DM的系统评价/Meta分析的证据质量为中高质量;该类药物治疗T2DM具有较好的临床疗效,但安全性不及安慰剂或其他口服降糖药。 OBJECTIVE:To reappraise systematic review/Meta-analysis(SRs/MAs)of the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP-1)receptor agonist in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2 DM),and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical use of these drugs in the treatment of T2 DM.METHODS:Retireved from Cochrane library,PubMed,Embase,CBM,Wanfang database and CNKI,systematic review/Meta-analysis about GLP-1 receptor agonist in the treatment of T2 DM were collected during the inception to Dec.2019.After data extraction of literatures met inclusion and exclusion criteria,GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence included in the study,and the evidence of efficacy and safety outcome indexes were summarized.RESULTS:Finally 31 literatures were included,involving 91 outcome indexes,and GRADE evidence quality was medium,among which 4(4.4%)were very-low-quality,33(36.3%)were low-quality,45(49.5%)were medium-quality,and 9(9.9%)were high-quality outcome indicators.The results of evidence summary showed that GLP-1 receptor agonists were better than or similar to placebo and other oral hypoglycemic drugs,better than dipeptidyl peptidase 4(DPP-4)inhibitors in reducing the level of HbA1 c;better than or similar to placebo,better than other oral hypoglycemic agents and DPP-4 inhibitors in reducing the level of fasting glucose;similar to DDP-4 inhibitors,higher than or similar to placebo,lower than other oral hypoglycemic drugs in the incidence of hypoglycemia;higher than other oral hypoglycemic drugs,placebo and DPP-4 inhibitors in the incidence of diarrhea and nausea;higher than other oral hypoglycemic drugs and placebo in the incidence of vomiting.CONCLUSIONS:The evidence quality of systematic review/Meta-analysis about GLP-1 receptor agonist in the treatment of T2 DM are moderate.These drugs have good clinical efficacy in the treatment of T2 DM,but their safety are not as good as placebo or other oral hypoglycemic drugs.
作者 连琯 谢卓霖 李美萱 李勇坤 张定华 LIAN Guan;XIE Zhuolin;LI Meixuan;LI Yongkun;ZHANG Dinghua(Dept.of Endocrinology,Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM,Lanzhou 730050,China;Dept.of Diabetes,Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM,Lanzhou 730050,China;Evidence-based Medical Center,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730050,China;Dept.of Hepatobiliary Surgery,West China Hospital of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2020年第21期2656-2664,共9页 China Pharmacy
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81460699) 国家中医药管理局国家中医临床研究基地业务建设科研专项课题(No.JDZX2015240)。
关键词 胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂 2型糖尿病 系统评价再评价 GRADE系统 Glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonist Type 2 diabetes mellitus Reappraisal of systematic review GRADE system
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献159

  • 1张萍,苏本利,孙崴,王颖,张霞,刘常华.糖化血红蛋白与全天不同时间血糖水平的关系[J].中华糖尿病杂志(1006-6187),2005,13(4):275-276. 被引量:20
  • 2吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:174
  • 3罗武庭.DJ—2可变矩形电子束曝光机的DMA驱动程序[J].LSI制造与测试,1989,10(4):20-26. 被引量:373
  • 4Becker LA,Oxman AD.Chapter 22:Overviews of reviews.In:Higgins JPT,Green S,eds.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.0.2 (updated September 2009).The Cochrane Collaboration,2009.Available from:www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 5Singh JA,Christensen R,Wells GA,et al.Biologics for rheumatoid arthritis:an overview of Cochrane reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2009,(4):CD007848.
  • 6Adams C,Dooley G,Jefferson T,et al.Overviews-the way forward for the collaboration? 8th Annual Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts,2000.Available from URL:http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clcmr/articles/CMR-2987/frame.html.
  • 7Jamtvedt G,Visst G.Overviews of overviews (OoO)-how to summarise and grade the evidence? Cochrane Colloquium,2005.
  • 8Smidt N,de Vet HC,Bouter LM,et al.Effectiveness of exercise therapy:a best-evidence summary of systematic reviews.Aust J Physiother,2005,51(2):71-85.
  • 9Linde K,Vickers A,Hondras M,et al.Systematic reviews of complementary therapies-an annotated bibliography.Part 1:acupuncture.BMC Complement Altern Med,2001,1:3.
  • 10Linde K,Hondras M,Vickers A,et al.Systematic reviews of complementary therapies-an annotated bibliography.Part 3:homeopathy.BMC Complement Altern Med,2001,1:4.

共引文献161

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部