摘要
目的:研究外科治疗室应用两种不同空气消毒方法的效果。方法:选择本院外科治疗室2019年1月12日~2019年7月18日共188d消毒时间作为研究样本,根据消毒方式不同分为常规组94d、试验组94d。其中常规组实施健之素消毒,试验组实施循环风紫外线消毒器进行消毒。对两组消毒前、后菌落值的变化情况进行比较分析。结果:两组消毒前菌落数差异不存在统计学意义(P>0.05),常规组消毒后菌落数相较于试验组明显更多,差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论:在外科治疗室应用循环风紫外线消毒器进行空气消毒较为方便、经济,且能够实施动态消毒,起到更好的消毒杀菌效果,值得广泛应用。
Objective:To study the effect of applying two different air disinfection methods in surgical treatment rooms.Methods:A total of 188d disinfection time from January 12,2019 to July 18,2019 was selected as a study sample,and the sample was divided into the regular group 94d and the test group 94d according to the disinfection method.Among them,the conventional group implemented the disinfection of the sanitizer,the test group implemented the circulating wind uv disinfection device for disinfection.The changes of pre-and post-sterile values were compared and analyzed.Results:There was no statistical significance in the difference of the number of colonies before disinfection in the two groups(P>0.05),and the number of colonies after normal group disinfection was significantly more than that of the experimental group,and the difference was significant(P<0.05),which was statistically significant.Conclusion:It is convenient and economical to apply circulating wind UV disinfection device in the surgical treatment room,and it can carry out dynamic disinfection,which can play a better disinfection effect,which is worthy of wide application.
作者
张秀枝
ZHANG Xiu-zhi(Outpatient Dressing Room of Tianjin People’s Hospital,Tianjin 300400)
出处
《中国医疗器械信息》
2020年第20期72-73,共2页
China Medical Device Information
关键词
外科治疗室
空气消毒
循环风紫外线消毒器
健之素
surgical treatment room
air disinfection
circulating wind UV sanitizer
Jianzhisu