期刊文献+

Oral contrast agents lead to underestimation of dose calculation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning for pelvic irradiation

原文传递
导出
摘要 Background:The effects of oral contrast agents(OCAs)on dosimetry have not been studied in detail.Therefore,this study aimed to examine the influence of OCAs on dose calculation in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans for rectal cancer.Methods:From 2008 to 2016,computed tomography(CT)images were obtained from 33 rectal cancer patients administered OCA with or without intravenous contrast agent(ICA)and 14 patients who received no contrast agent.CT numbers of organs at risk were recorded and converted to electronic densities.Volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans were designed before and after the original densities were replaced with non-enhanced densities.Doses to the planned target volume(PTV)and organs at risk were compared between the plans.Results:OCA significantly increased the mean and maximum densities of the bowels,while the effects of ICA on these parameters depended on the blood supply of the organs.With OCA,the actual doses for PTV were significantly higher than planned and doses to the bowel increased significantly although moderately.However,the increase in the volume receiving a high-range doses was substantial the absolute change of intestine volume receiving≥52 Gy:1.46[0.05-3.99,cubic centimeter range:-6.74 to 128.12],the absolute change of colon volume receiving≥50 Gy:0.34[0.01-1.53 cc,range:-0.08 to 3.80 cc].Dose changes due to ICA were insignificant.Pearson correlation showed that dose changes were significantly correlated with a high intestinal volume within or near the PTV(ρ>0.5,P<0.05)and with the density of enhanced intestine(ρ>0.3,P<0.05).Conclusions:Contrast agents applied in simulation cause underestimation of doses in actual treatment.The overdose due to ICA was slight,while that due to OCA was moderate.The bowel volume receiving≥50Gy was dramatically increased when OCA within the bowel was absent.Physicians should be aware of these issues if the original plan is barely within clinical tolerance or if a considerable volume of enhanced intestine is within or near the PTV.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2020年第17期2061-2070,共10页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
基金 This work was supported by the grants from the National Key Projects of Research and Development of China(No.2016YFC0904600) the Beijing Municipal Science&Technology Commission of China(No.Z171100001017116)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002, 359:1761-1767.
  • 2Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Francis R, Kanis JA, Marsh D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas 2009, 62: 105-108.
  • 3Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis- related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007, 22: 465-475.
  • 4Genant HK, Grampp S, Gluer CC, Faulkner KG, Jergas M, Engelke K, et al. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. J Bone Miner Res 1994, 9: 1503-1514.
  • 5Fan B, Lu Y, Genant H, Fuerst T, Shepherd J. Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems? Osteoporos Int 2010, 21: 1227- 1236.
  • 6Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Brys P, Nijs J, et al. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone 1997, 20: 213-218.
  • 7Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Li J, Meta MD, Scillitani A, Lang TF. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip. Acta Radiol 2006, 47: 574-580.
  • 8Lang TF, Guglielmi G, van Kujik C, De Serio A, Cammisa M, Genant HK. Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures. Bone 2002, 30: 247-250,.
  • 9Cheng XG, Li J, Lu Y, Keyak J, Lang T. Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: Association with hip fracture. Bone 2007, 40: 169- 174.
  • 10Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Beck-Nielsen H, Nepper-Rasmussen H J, Mosekilde L. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro. Bone 1998, 23: 283-290.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部