人民法院的运动式治理偏好——基于人民法院解决“执行难”行动的分析

The Campaign-Style Governance Preference of the People’s Court:Based on the Analysis of its Solution to the Problem of Difficult Enforcement

人民法院在解决"执行难"过程中涉及不同类型的相关利益群体,也形成了三种合法性类型:管制合法性、规范合法性和认知合法性。在多重合法性压力下,人民法院对执行工作相关合法性受众所作的回应措施之间并不具有同等的重要性。受政法场域权力结构的制约,人民法院形成了对资源分配的权威部门所带来的合法性压力的偏向性。在治理资源欠缺以及对组织长期发展的战略考量双重因素的影响下,人民法院既"被动接受"也"主动迎合"了运动式治理。人民法院采用运动式治理是组织自身战略、社会互动网络、组织场域结构三者共同作用的结果,体现了中国特色的政法逻辑与司法专业智慧的有机结合。

The people’s court has dealt with different types of relevant interest groups in the process of solving the problem of difficult enforcement,and has also faced three types of organizational legitimacyregulatory legitimacy,normative legitimacy and cognitive legitimacy.Under the pressure of multiple legitimacy,the people’s court does not emphasize equally the measures of the people’s court responding to the audience involved in the enforcement of court.Constrained by the power structure of the political-legal field,the people’s court has formed a preference towards the pressure of legitimacy brought by the authority of resource allocation.Under the influence of the dual factors including the lack of governance resources and strategic considerations for the long-term development of the organization,the people’s court both"passively accepts"and"actively caters to"the campaign style governance.The adoption of the campaignstyle governance by the people’s court is the result of the interaction among the organization’s own strategy,the social interaction network,and the organization’s field structure,which embodies the organic combination of political-legal logic with Chinese characteristics and judicial professional wisdom.