期刊文献+

经腹会阴联合根治术后患者不适反应自我报告量表的构建

Construction of self-reporting index system for patients with Miles postoperative discomfort
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:构建经腹会阴联合根治(Miles)术后患者不适反应自我报告量表,为临床医护人员评价Miles术后患者的生理、心理方面的不适反应提供评估工具。方法:通过阅读文献及相关指南、半结构式访谈、研究小组讨论形成Miles术后患者不适反应自我报告量表维度和条目池,经过2轮Delphi专家函询筛选条目形成初始量表,用初始量表预调查进行项目分析、探索性因子分析和信效度检验,进一步筛查条目形成正式量表。结果:Miles术后患者不适反应自我报告量表包含2个维度,25个条目,累计方差贡献率64.783%,内容效度0.980,Cronbach's α系数0.853,重测信度0.960。结论:该量表有良好的信效度,可用于Miles术后患者不适反应自我评估。 Objective:To construct a self-reporting scale for patients with Miles postoperative discomfort and provide an assessment tool for clinical medical staff to evaluate the physical and psychological discomfort of patients after Miles postoperative.Methods:After reading the literature and related guides,semi-structured interviews,and research group discussions,the dimensions and entry pools of the self-report scale for patient discomfort after Miles surgery were formed.After 2 rounds of Delphi expert inquiry,the entries were screened to form the initial scale.The initial scale was used for pre-survey conduct project analysis,exploratory factor analysis,and reliability and validity tests,and further screen entries to form a formal scale.Results:The Miles postoperative patient discomfort self-reporting scale includes 2 dimensions and 25 items.The cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.783%,the content validity was 0.980,the cronbach'sαcoefficient was 0.853,and the retest reliability was 0.960.Conclusion:The scale has good reliability and validity,and it can be used for self-assessment of patients'uncomfortable reactions after Miles operation.
作者 魏清风 熊燕 李第芬 梅月英 WEI Qing-feng;XIONG Yan;LI Di-fen;MEI Yue-ying(Jiangxi Provincial Tumor Hospital,Nanchang,Jiangxi 330004;Foshan First People's Hospital,Foshan,Guangdong 528000;Ganxian District People's Hospital,Ganzhou,Jiangxi 341000;Anyuan People's Hospital,Anyuan,Jiangxi 342100)
出处 《赣南医学院学报》 2020年第9期958-963,976,共7页 JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
基金 江西省卫生健康委科技计划项目(20201091)。
关键词 直肠癌 经腹会阴联合根治术 不适反应 自我报告 构建 Rectal cancer Miles surgery Discomfort Self-report Construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1俞晓琳.项目反应理论与经典测验理论之比较[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),1998(4):79-82. 被引量:27
  • 2唐宁玉,戴志恒.项目反应理论在编制现代性量表中的应用[J].心理科学,1995,18(3):144-148. 被引量:2
  • 3辛涛.项目反应理论研究的新进展[J].中国考试,2005(7):18-21. 被引量:26
  • 4Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 5Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 6Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 7Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 8Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 9Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 10Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.

共引文献1345

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部