期刊文献+

大学生学校归属感问卷的编制 被引量:4

Development of sense of belonging to school scale among college students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制适合我国大学生的学校归属感问卷并检验其信效度。方法:通过访谈、文献检索形成问卷的初始项目,在预测的基础上,采用自编问卷对被试进行施测,得到有效问卷661份。用中文版PSSM量表进行效标效度检验。结果:大学生学校归属感问卷共包括5维度:同伴支持、个人地位认可、学校环境、学校融入、教师行为,共解释总变异的69.98%;5因素模型在验证性因素分析中得到了较好的验证。问卷总分与中文版PSSM量表总分显著正相关(r=0.69,P<0.001)。总问卷Cronbachα系数为0.96,5个因素的Cronbachα系数为0.89~0.94。总问卷的分半信度为0.87,5个因素的分半信度为0.88~0.93。结论:大学生学校归属感问卷由5个因素构成,信度效度符合心理测量学的要求,可用于相关的研究和实践。 Objective:To develop and validate the Sense of Belonging to School Scale among College Students.Methods:The preliminary scale was constructed based on a literature study and semi-structured interviews.Data from 661undergraduates were used to conduct item analysis and examine the reliability and validity of the scale.The Chinese Version of Psychological Sense of School Membership Scale(PSSM-CR)was used to test its criterion validity.Results:EFA showed that the Sense of Belonging to School Scale among College Students was composed of five factors:Peer support,recognition of personal status,school environment,school engagement and teachers’behavior,explaining 69.98%of the total variance.CFA showed that the 5-factor model fitted the data well.The total score of the scale was positively correlated with the score of the PSSM-CR(r=0.69,P<0.001).The Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.96,and 0.88-0.93for the 5factors.The split-half reliability of the total scale was 0.87,and 0.88-0.93for the 5factors.Conclusion:The Sense of Belonging to School Scale among College Students was composed of five factors,and the questionnaire meets the needs of psychometrics,which can be used in both research and practice.
作者 刘沛兵 苗淼 陈雅镧 梁馨文 姜欣怡 于跃 LIU Peibing;MIAO Miao;CHEN Yalan(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249,China)
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2020年第10期1567-1571,共5页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(编号:18YJC190016) 中国政法大学科研创新项目资助(编号:19ZFQ18002) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词 学校归属感 大学生 信度 效度 Sense of belonging to school College students Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献183

共引文献1626

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部