混合担保中担保人之间的追偿权证成——《民法典》第392条的实证解释论

Justification of the Right of Recourse between Guarantors in Mixed Guarantees——Empirical Interpretation of Article 392 of the Civil Code

担保是保障债权实现的手段。在实践中,债权人既要求债务人或者第三人提供物的担保,又要求第三人提供保证担保的情形,被称为混合担保。《民法典》第392条对混合担保情形下担保人之间是否可以进行内部追偿的问题未置可否,本文针对这一问题展开讨论,通过考察梳理我国司法实践的裁判状况,从司法实证解释论的角度,证成赋予混合担保中担保人之间内部追偿权的正当性。

Guarantee is the means to ensure the realization of creditor's rights.In practice,the creditor not only requires the debtor or the third party to provide material guarantee,but also requires the third party to provide credit guarantee,which is called mixed guarantee.Article 392 of the Civil Code does not say whether the right of contribution between guarantors can be carried out in the case of mixed guarantee.This paper discusses this problem and sorts out the judgment of judicial practice in our country.From the perspective of judicial empirical interpretation theory,the internal recourse right between guarantors in mixed guarantee is justified.