期刊文献+

基于预警分级管理的SBAR沟通模式在急诊观察室交接班中的应用 被引量:16

Application of SBAR communication mode based on early warning hierarchical management in emergency observation room
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基于预警分级管理的SBAR沟通模式在急诊观察室交接班中的应用效果。方法:制订基于预警分级管理的SBAR沟通模式的交接方案,对观察室护士进行系统培训并落实方案。将2018年11-12月观察室18名护士交接的455例患者列为对照组,实施传统的SBAR沟通模式进行交接班。将2019年11-12月以上护士交接的443例患者列为观察组,实施基于预警分级管理的SBAR沟通模式的交接班。比较2组患者护理不良事件的发生率、护理交接班质量、医护对交接班满意度的情况。结果:观察组患者不良事件发生率为1.81%(8/443),对照组为7.91%(36/455),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2值为17.96,P<0.05);观察组护士的交接班护理质量和护士对病情知晓率分别为(91.37±2.73)分、96.7%(58/60),对照组分别为(89.07±2.76)分、81.7%(49/60),2组比较差异有统计学意义(t值为-2.38、χ^2值为6.99,P<0.05);观察组医生、护士对护理交接班满意度分别为95.0%(57/60)、95.0%(57/60),对照组分别为83.3%(50/60)、81.7%(49/60),2组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2值为4.23、5.18,P<0.05)。结论:基于预警分级的SBAR沟通模式能显著提高急诊观察室护士交接班中的预警能力,减少护理不良事件的发生,提高护理交接班的质量,提升医护双方的满意度。 Objective To explore the application effect of SBAR communication mode based on early warning hierarchical management in emergency observation room.Methods Formulating the handover program of SBAR communication mode based on the early warning hierarchical management,systematically training the nurses of the observation room and put into effect.The 455 patients transferred by 18 nurses in the observation room from November to December 2018 were listed as the control group,and the traditional SBAR communication mode was implemented for the handover.A total of 443 patients with nurse handover from November to December 2019 were included in the observation group,and the SBAR communication mode based on early warning hierarchical management was implemented.The incidence of adverse nursing events,quality of nursing handover,doctors'and nurses'satisfaction with the handover were compared between the two groups.Results The incidence of adverse events was 1.81%(8/443)in the observation group and 7.91%(36/455)in the control group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ^2 value was 17.96,P<0.05).In the observation group,the nursing handover quality and nurse's knowledge of the patients’condition were(91.37±2.73)points and(96.7%,58/60)respectively,while those in the control group were(89.07±2.76)points and(81.7%,49/60).The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t value was-2.38,χ^2 value was 6.99,all P<0.05).The satisfaction of doctors and nurses on nursing handover was 95.0%(57/60)and 95.0%(57/60)in the observation group respectively,and that in the control group was 83.3%(50/60)and 81.7%(49/60)respectively.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(χ2 values were 4.23,5.18,P<0.05).Conclusions SBAR communication mode based on early warning classification can significantly improve the early warning ability of nurses in emergency observation room during the shift,reduce the occurrence of adverse nursing events,improve the quality of nursing shift,and improve the satisfaction of doctors and nurses.
作者 施银 罗彩凤 杨丽萍 崔静文 徐艺 Shi Yin;Luo Caifeng;Yang Liping;Cui Jingwen;Xu Yi(Emergency Department,Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212000,China;Medical College,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212000,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2020年第31期2470-2476,共7页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 江苏省教育厅基金 (JGX14-088)。
关键词 预警分级管理 修订版预警评分表 SBAR沟通模式 急诊观察室 交接班 Early warning hierarchical management Revised early warning rating scale SBAR communication mode Emergency observation room Handover
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献117

  • 1孟新科,杨径,吴华雄,朱虹,郑晓英,魏刚,刘德红,苏顺庭.MEWS与APACHEⅡ评分在急诊潜在危重病患者病情评价和预后预测中的对比研究[J].实用临床医药杂志,2005,9(8):1-4. 被引量:158
  • 2英国早期预警评分介绍[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(2):148-148. 被引量:34
  • 3Australian College for Emergency Medicine. Access block and overcrowding in emergency departments [ R ]. ACEP, 2004.
  • 4Garcea G, Gouda M, Hebbes C, et al. Predictors of severity and survival in acute pancreatitis: validation of the efficacy of early warning scores [ J ]. Pancreas, 2008, 37 ( 3 ) : 54 - 61.
  • 5李子剑.邓跃林.建立在MEWS上的急诊程序化监护方案与急诊常规监护方案的临床对照研究[D].2008,长沙:中南大学.
  • 6Rhee K,Fisher C,Willitis N.The rapid acute physiology score[J].Am J Emerg Med,1987,5(4):278-282.
  • 7Knaus WA,Draper EA,Wagner DP,et al.APACHEⅡ:a severithof disease classification system[J].Crit Care Med,1985,13(10):818-829.
  • 8Olsson T,Terent A,Lind L.Rapid Emergency Medical Score:a newprognostic tool for in-hospital mortality in nonsurgical emergencydepartment patients[J].J Inter Med,2004,255(5):579-587.
  • 9American Colloge of Chest Physician/Society of Care MedicineConsensus Conference.Definition for sepsis and organ failure andguidelines for the use of innovative threpies in sepsis[J].Crit CareMed,1992,20(6):864-874.
  • 10Kellett J,Deane B.The simple clinical score predicts mortality for30 days after admission to an acute medical unit[J].Q J Med,2006,99(11):771-781.

共引文献302

同被引文献189

引证文献16

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部