期刊文献+

体验认知与语言表征之间呈等值对应关系吗? 被引量:5

Are there any equivalent correspondences between embodied cognition and linguistic representation?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 体验认知与语言表征之间呈等值对应关系吗?事实并非完全如此。其理由在于:首先,体验认知会因现实中的四类重要因变量(即正常人、残疾人、儿童和不同文化的个体差异)而出现非等值对应表征;其次,语言符号本身具有先天性局限,不能非常客观地表征我们所体验的一切;最后,身体习语进一步证实了体验认知的有限表征。换言之,体验方式和效果很难找到一个统一的理想状态,会因人因时因地而异。即便体验认知没问题,也会因语言符号自身的局限性,最终可能永远无法进入表征程序。为此,语言表征所展示的世界是主观的、有限的认知世界,而非真实的客观世界。人们虽有一定的应对策略,但结果是有限的。 Are there any equivalent correspondences between embodied cognition and linguistic repre⁃sentation?Hereby the author argues that it is utterly not.The reasons can be unveiled as follows:firstly,embodied cognition is sure to vary greatly without any correspondent representa⁃tions in terms of four vital variables(individual embodiment of normal persons,abnormal per⁃sons,distinct embodiment of children and people from different cultures);secondly,the inborn demerits of linguistic symbols are bound to result in the incompetent representation of what we experience bodily;finally,the very limited representation of language is further verified in body idioms.In other words,the manners and effects of such embodiment can hardly be put into a unified ideal state,resulting from personal,temporal and local changes.Even if there are no problems in embodied cognition,the demerits of linguistic symbol will not be capable of bringing some embodiment into the final process of representation forever.Therefore,the world represented in language is inevitably a subjective limited world,not a real objective world.some countermeasures taken,the results are not yet so ideal as we expect.
作者 刘国辉 LIU Guohui(College of Foreign Languages,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)
出处 《外文研究》 2020年第3期15-24,107,共11页 Foreign Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献351

共引文献878

同被引文献68

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部