期刊文献+

奥马珠单抗治疗儿童重度过敏性哮喘的快速卫生技术评估 被引量:2

A rapid health technology assessment of omalizumab in the treatment of children with severe allergic asthma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评估奥马珠单抗治疗儿童重度过敏性哮喘的有效性、安全性和经济性,检索国内外相关文献数据库和卫生技术评估组织官网,共纳入9篇文献,应用快速卫生技术评估方法进行评估。结果显示,对于儿童重度过敏性哮喘,奥马珠单抗治疗可显著降低患者哮喘急性重度发作的风险,缓解临床症状,减少控制用药剂量,同时不良反应发生率低,安全性好。但奥马珠单抗目前售价昂贵,与安慰剂或哮喘标准治疗相比不具有成本效果优势。 To quickly evaluate the efficacy,safety and economy of omalizumab in the treatment of children with severe allergic asthma.A total of 9 reports were included by searching domestic and foreign related literature databases and the official website of the health technology assessment organization,which were evaluated by a rapid health technology assessment method.The results showed that omalizumab could significantly reduce the risk of acute severe asthma and the dosage of control medication,and alleviate clinical symptoms for children with severe allergic asthma.At the same time,the incidence of adverse reactions was low and the safety was good.Economic studies at home and abroad showed that omalizumab was not a costeffective option compared with standard therapy or placebo in children with severe allergic asthma because of its high price.
作者 周华 车大钿 Zhou Hua;Che Datian(Department of VIP,Shanghai Children’s Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200040,China)
出处 《上海医药》 CAS 2020年第21期13-16,24,共5页 Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 奥马珠单抗 快速卫生技术评估 儿童重度过敏性哮喘 omalizumab rapid health technology assessment severe allergic asthma in children
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Tricco A C,Antony J,Zarin W,et al.A scoping review of rapid review methods[J].BMC Med,2015,13(1):224.
  • 2Polisena J,Garritty C,Kamel C,et al.Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making:a descriptive analysis of processes and methods[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):26.
  • 3Ganann R,Ciliska D,Thomas H.Expediting systematic reviews:methods and implications of rapid reviews[J].Implement Sci,2010(5):56.
  • 4Khangura S,Konnyu K,Cushman R,et al.Evidence summaries:the evolution of a rapid review approach[J].Syst Rev,2012(1):10.
  • 5Harker J,Kleijnen J.What is a rapid review?A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments[J].Int J Evid Based Healthc,2012,10(4):397-410.
  • 6Featherstone R M,Dryden D M,Foisy M,et al.Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews:an analysis of results,conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews[J].Syst Rev,2015(4):50.
  • 7Hailey D.Toward transparency in health technology assessment:a checklist for HTA reports[J].Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2003,19(1):1-7.
  • 8Brouwers M,Kho M E,Browman G P,et al.AGREE II:Advancing guideline development,reporting and evaluation in healthcare[J].J Clin Epidemol,2010,63(12):1308-1311.
  • 9Higgins J P T,Green S.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0[updated March 2011][J/OL].(2011-03-10)[2015-07-21].http://www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 10Shea B J,Grimshaw J M,Wells G A,et al.Development of AMSTAR:A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews[J].BMC Med Res Methodol,2007,7(10):1-10.e7-8.

共引文献131

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部