期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术单胎妊娠女性围产结局分析 被引量:4

Analysis of perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology singletons
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析辅助生殖技术(ART)单胎妊娠女性围产期母婴结局与自然妊娠女性的差异。方法:回顾性分析了234例ART单胎妊娠女性(ART组)和20 906名自然妊娠单胎女性(自然妊娠组)围产期妊娠结局,分别比较两组间母婴围产期并发症差异,包括妊娠期高血压疾病、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)、前置胎盘、早产、产后出血、分娩方式等,新生儿结局如新生儿平均出生体重、新生儿窒息、低出生体重儿及巨大儿的发生率、新生儿转入新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的发生率及新生儿出生性别比。结果:ART组较自然妊娠组GDM(χ^2=67.978,P=0.000)、前置胎盘(χ^2=27.565,P=0.000)、早产(χ^2=11.874,P=0.001)、剖宫产分娩(χ^2=92.042,P=0.000)的发生风险均显著增加。ART组较自然妊娠组低出生体重儿(χ^2=13.534,P=0.000)、巨大儿(χ^2=8.328,P=0.004)、新生儿转入NICU(χ^2=5.763,P=0.016)的发生风险均显著增加。结论:与自然妊娠女性相比,ART单胎妊娠女性母婴不良围产结局显著增加。 Objective: To analyze the perinatal outcomes of assisted reproductive technology(ART)singleton pregnancies in comparison to spontaneously conceived singletons. Methods: Perinatal outcomes of 234 ART singletons(ART group) and 20 906 spontaneous pregnancies(spontaneous pregnancy group)were analyzed retrospectively. Perinatal complications such as hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy(HDCP),gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM),placenta previa,premature delivery,postpartum hemorrhage,mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes such as neonatal average birth weight, the incidence of the neonatal asphyxia,low birth weight infants,macrosomia,and neonatal transfer to NICU and neonatal sex ratio were compared between the two groups. Results: ART group had higher GDM(χ^2= 67.978, P=0.000),placenta previa(χ^2=27.565, P=0.000), premature delivery(χ^2=11.874, P=0.001)and cesarean delivery rate(χ^2=92.042, P=0.000)than spontaneous pregnancy group. ART group had higher low birth weight infants(χ^2=13.534, P=0.000),macrosomia(χ^2= 8. 328, P = 0. 004) and neonatal transfer to NICU rate(χ^2= 5. 763, P = 0. 016) than spontaneous pregnancy group.Conclusion: Compared with spontaneous pregnancy group, ART singleton pregnancies increased the risks of adverse perinatal outcomes.
作者 魏丽坤 宋学茹 赵明飞 王崇丹 徐铮 丁洁 薛凤霞 WEI Li-kun;SONG Xue-ru;ZHAO Ming-fei;WANG Chong-dan;XU Zheng;DING Jie;XUE Feng-xia(Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,General Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin300052,China;Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Tanggu Maternity Hospital,Tianjin Binhai New District,Tianjin 300451,China;Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Tianjin Red Bridge Hospital,Tianjin 300131,China;Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Tianjin Beichen Chinese Medicine Hospital,Tianjin 300400,China)
出处 《天津医科大学学报》 2020年第6期530-532,537,共4页 Journal of Tianjin Medical University
基金 天津医科大学科学基金(2016KYZM13)。
关键词 辅助生殖技术 围产结局 妊娠期糖尿病 前置胎盘 早产 assisted reproductive technology perinatal outcomes gestational diabetes mellitus placenta previa premature delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1谢幸.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:274.
  • 2Damewood MD. The role of the new reproductive technolo- gies including IVF and GIFT in endometriosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin NorthAm, 1989, 16(1): 179-191.
  • 3Fernando S, Breheny S, Jaques AM, et al. Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technol- ogies[J].Ferfil Steril, 2009, 91(2): 325-330.
  • 4Brosens I, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, et al. Risks of adverse preg- nancy outcome in endometriosis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2012, 98(1): 30-35.
  • 5Vercellini P, Parazzini F, Pietropaolo G, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with peritoneal,ovarian and rectovag- inal endometriosis:a retrospective cohort study[J]. B JOG, 2012, 119(12): 1538-1543.
  • 6Braun DP, Dmowski WP. Endometriosis: abnormal endome- triumand dysfunctional immune response[J]. Curt Opin Ob- stet Gynecol, 1998, 10(5): 365-369.
  • 7Bulun SE. Endometriosis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(3): 268-279.
  • 8Takemura Y, Osuga Y, Fujimoto A, et al. Increased risk of placenta previa is associated with endometriosis and tubal factor infertility in assisted reproductive technology preg- nancy[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2013, 29(2): 113-115.
  • 9Lessey BA.Implantation defects in infertile women with endometriosis[J]. Ann N YAcad Sci, 2002, 955: 265-280.
  • 10Kuivasaari P, Hippelainen M, Anttila M, et al. Effect of en- dometriosis on IVF/ICSI outcome: stagelII/IV endometrio- sis worsens cumulative pregnancy and live-born rates[J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(11): 3130-3135.

共引文献6

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部