摘要
九一八事变后,中共、青年党、第三党及国民党中央派、改组派等各党派纷纷“运动学生”,力图使学生反日运动为本党利益服务。一方面,各党派彼此对立的学运政策,催生了北平学生的“请愿”与“示威”之争;另一方面,挽救民族危亡的共同目标,又促成大夏大学抗日会各党派学生之间内争与合作交糅的复杂关系。学生群众对运动他们的政党并不一定投桃报李,其否认受政党利用的“自主”倾向也一直存在。各党派对学运的影响,很大程度上取决于他们是否以学生利益为主体,是否尊重多数学生“抗日救国”的意愿。
After September 18th Incident,the Communist Party,the Youth Party,the Third Party,the Central Group and the Reorganization Group in KMT mobilized students in order to serve the interests of the party.On the one hand,the opposition of student movement policy gave birth to the dispute between“petition”and“demonstration”of students in Peiping;on the other hand,the common goal of saving the nation in danger caused the complex relationship of internal struggle and cooperation among students of all parties in the Anti-Japanese Association of Daxia University.The masses of students didn’t necessarily give a plum in return for a peach to the political parties,and their“autonomy”tendency denying used by political parties had always existed.To a great extent,the influence of all parties on the student movement depended on whether they took the interests of students as the main body and respected the will of most students to“resist Japan and save the country”.
作者
周斌
ZHOU Bin(Institute of Modern History,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100100,China)
出处
《安徽史学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期86-96,共11页
Historical Research In Anhui
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“中国近代民众运动全史(1919—1949)”(19ZDA211)的阶段性成果。
关键词
九一八事变
学生反日运动
党派政争
September 18th Incident
student anti-Japanese movement
Party contention