马克思主义哲学的本体论与传统哲学之异同

THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MARXIST PHILOSOPHY’S ONTOLOGY AND TRADITIONAL PHILOSOPHY

所谓哲学的“本体论”,应该是哲学之“本体”。哲学之本体所指意义有两重,一是万词之归结,二是万词之根据。传统哲学的本体论,都是以“实体”为本体。马克思哲学的本体论,则是以“实践”为本体,比传统哲学更完善,更有科学性和正确性。承认实践的本体性,根本的原因就在于,对实践一词之理解,还不正确或不到位——还只是实践的“一方面”,还不是实践之全部,还不是主、客观之“交融”,还不是主、实体之“关系”,即“个人”与“现实”之关系。对实践如此理解,既不合马克思之本意,也必将削弱其哲学固有的盖世的影响力,所以必须纠正或改进。

The so-called“ontology”of philosophy should be the“ontology”of philosophy.The ontology of philosophy should be a term of philosophy.This word has two meanings in philosophy,one is the conclusion of all words,and the other is the basis of all words.The ontology of traditional philosophy is based on“entity”.The ontology of Marxist philosophy takes“practice”as its ontology,which is more complete,more scientific and correct than traditional philosophy.The fundamental reason for acknowledging the ontology of practice is that the understanding of the word practice is not correct or not in place.It is only one aspect of practice,not all of practice,and it is not a blend of subjective and objective.,Is not the“relationship”between the subject and the entity-that is,the relationship between“individual”and“reality”.Such an understanding of practice does not conform to Marx’s original intent,and will certainly weaken the inherent influence of its philosophy,so it must be corrected or improved.