期刊文献+

宁波市鄞州区透析患者30天再入院影响因素分析及简易评分工具构建 被引量:2

Prediction of readmission within 30 days in maintenance dialysis patients using scoring system developed from electronic health record data in Yinzhou,China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的30天再入院是反映疾病转归和医疗质量的重要指标。本研究通过分析宁波市鄞州区健康医疗大数据平台数据,探讨透析患者发生30天再入院的影响因素、估算效应大小并建立简易评分工具。方法纳入2010年1月~2020年1月在鄞州区医疗机构进行过住院治疗,未发生院内死亡且出院诊断ICD编码符合透析相关诊断的18岁以上患者。采集患者年龄,性别,住院记录,出院诊断等信息。对于有多次住院记录的患者,随机选择一次作为指示住院记录。统计模型采用COX比例风险模型。结果最终纳入患者1614例,发生30天再入院患者348例(21.56%)。构建多因素COX比例风险模型显示,与患者30天再入院相关的因素为高查尔斯合并症指数(Charles comorbidity index,CCI)评分(对比CCI 2分组,3~4分组风险比HR=1.257,95%CI:0.917~1.724,≥5分组HR=1.848,95%CI:1.374~2.486)、既往半年内住院次数(HR=1.576,95%CI:1.471~1.688)、本次住院时间(HR=1.010,95%CI:1.001~1.020)、腹膜透析(对比血液透析,HR=1.505,95%CI:1.207~1.876)。利用以上因素构建简易评分工具,可通过患者评分对应再入院发生概率。结论对宁波市鄞州区住院透析患者的分析显示,高CCI评分、既往半年内住院次数多、住院时间长、腹膜透析患者发生30天再入院的风险更高,应用简易评分工具可用于临床中对透析患者再入院风险进行评估。 Objective Readmission within 30 days after hospital discharge is an important indicator for disease prognosis and health care quality.This study aims to explore risk factors associated with 30-day readmission in maintenance dialysis patients and to build score sheets for risk prediction.Methods Data were taken from patients receiving maintenance dialysis and discharged from hospitals located in Yinzhou,Ningbo,between January 2010 and January 2020.Age,sex,hospitalization records and diagnoses on discharge were collected.The outcome was the readmission within 30 days after discharge of the index hospitalization.The index hospitalization was arbitrarily selected when there were multiple hospitalizations for a patient.Charles Comorbidity Index(CCI)was calculated as an indicator of multi-comorbidities status.All patients had 2 scores due to their status of dialysis.COX proportional hazard regression model was utilized to explore the potential risk factors.Score sheets were developed to predict readmission from theβ-coefficients of COX proportional hazards model.Results Among the 1614 patients,348(21.56%)had a 30-day hospital readmission.Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard model showed that higher CCI(CCI 3~4 vs.CCI 2,HR=1.257,95%CI:0.917~1.724;CCI≥5 vs.CCI2,HR=1.848,95%CI:1.374~2.486),more hospitalizations in the prior 6 months(HR=1.576,95%CI:1.471~1.688),inpatient days(HR=1.010,95%CI:1.001~1.020),peritoneal dialysis(HR=1.505,95%CI:1.207~1.876).These variables were used to build score sheets to predict the readmission risk.Conclusions CCI,multiple hospitalizations in the prior 6 months,inpatient days and peritoneal dialysis were associated with 30-day readmission in patients receiving maintenance dialysis,and could be used for risk prediction.
作者 孙小宇 聂振禹 孙烨祥 包蓓艳 林鸿波 张路霞 SUN Xiao-yu;NIE Zhen-yu;SUN Ye-xiang;BAO Bei-yan;LIN Hong-bo;ZHANG Lu-xia(National Institute of Health Data Science at Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;Division of Nephrology,The Second Ningbo Yinzhou Hospital,Ningbo 315211,China;Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Ningbo 315100;Renal Division,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
出处 《中国血液净化》 CSCD 2020年第11期721-725,共5页 Chinese Journal of Blood Purification
基金 北京市高精尖学科建设项目(BMU2019GJJXK001)。
关键词 30天再入院 透析 CCI评分 电子医疗记录 风险预测 30-day readmission Dialysis Charles Comorbidity Index Electronic health record data Prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1陆露,毛家亮,赵焕昌,沈心逸.抗焦虑抑郁药物治疗对心绞痛伴心理障碍患者再发病及再入院的影响[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(27):3176-3178. 被引量:17
  • 2张文新,张博恒,张渊.缩短平均住院日 有效地提高医院的效率和效益[J].中国卫生经济,2007,26(7):36-37. 被引量:52
  • 3DE FRANCISCO D, ANDERSON D, PANTANO R, et al. The rela- tionship between length of hospital stay and rapid-readmission rates [J]. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1980, 31 (3): 196-197.
  • 4OUSKANDER J G, DIAZ S, HAIN D, et al. Frequency and diagno-ses associated with 7-and 30-day readmission of skilled nursing fa- cility patients to a nonteaching community hospital[J]. Join'hal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2011, 12(3): 195-203.
  • 5WILLIAMS S, BOTTLE A, AYLIN P. J-ngth of hospital stay and subsequent emergency readmission[J]. BMJ, 2005, 331: 371.
  • 6KALRA A D, FISHER R S, AXELROD P. Decreased length of stay and cumulative hospitalized days despite increased patient ad- missions and readmissions in an area of urban poverty[J]. J Gen In- tern Med, 2010, 25(9); 930-935.
  • 7Benbassat J, Taragin M. Hospital readmissions as a measure of quali- ty of health care: advans and limitations[J]. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2000, 160(8): 1074-1081.
  • 8JENCKS S F, WILLIAMS M V, COLEMAN E A. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program[J]. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2009, 360( 14): 18-28.
  • 9WILLIAMS M V. A requirement to reduce readmissions: take care of the patient, not just the disease[J]. JAMA, 2013, 309(4): 394-396.
  • 10BERENSON R A, PAULUS R A, KALMAN N S. Medicare's read- missions-reduction program: a positive alternative[J]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012, 366(15): 1364-1366.

共引文献37

同被引文献15

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部