捕诉合一:新时代背景下的合理性与完善路径探讨

Discussion on the Pattern of Sentencing Suggestion under the Lenient System of Guilty Plea

在推行捕诉合一过程中,理论界与实务界提出了一些质疑,但都不足以成为反对实行捕诉合一改革的理由,捕诉合一的改革势在必行。捕诉合一是在以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革、监察体制改革以及司法责任制改革中应运而生,既能解决案多人少的现实困境,又契合人权保障理念,具有正当性与合理性。当然,捕诉合一的改革需要各方共同参与,形成监督制约机制,且通过设立救济机制、坚持证据裁判原则、奉行少捕慎捕理念以及建立审查逮捕诉讼化构造等,以保证改革的顺利进行。

The establishment of the leniency system of guilty plea provides space for the prosecuting authority to put forward the Suggestions of precise punishment,and meanwhile the suggestions of precise punishment also promote the application of the leniency system of guilty plea.In practice,there is a debate between the precise punishment and the range punishment.However,in cases where a lenient system of admission of guilt is applied,the adoption of the precise punishment has become an inevitable trend in criminal justice practice.Although there are obstacles in the practical application of the proposal of precise punishment,it can clear up the obstacles and more effectively apply the leniency system by changing the judicial concept,changing the assessment indicators of prosecuting authority and improving the capability of procurators.