期刊文献+

国际碳交易政策选择的效果研究 被引量:1

Research on Effects of Choice of International Carbon Emission Trading Policies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 考虑两个相似国家可以选择不实施碳交易政策、合作实施碳交易政策以及不合作实施碳交易政策,构建出相应的博弈模型,比较了不同碳交易政策选择下两国企业利润、环境质量及国家福利的变化。结果表明:与两国不实施碳交易政策相比,两国合作和不合作实施碳交易政策均可以改善各国的环境质量和提高国家福利,且两国合作实施碳交易政策下的环境质量更好,国家福利更高;当碳排放的环境损害程度满足一定条件时,两国合作和不合作实施碳交易政策也可能增加各国企业利润。 Considering that two identical countries can choose not to carry out carbon emission trading policy,independently or cooperatively carry out carbon emission policy,three game models are constructed to analyze changes of different choices on profit,environment quality and social welfare.It’s found that compared to the choice of not carrying out carbon emission trading policy,countries choose to independently or cooperatively carry out carbon emission policy could improve their environment quality and social welfare,which are more high under the choice of cooperation in carbon emission trading policy.Furthermore,profit under the choice of cooperation or non-cooperation in carbon emission trading policy may be higher when degree of environmental damage from carbon emissions satisfies certain conditions.
作者 余静 余惠芬 YU Jing;YU Hui-fen(Guangdong University of Finance,Guangzhou 510521,China)
机构地区 广东金融学院
出处 《湖北经济学院学报》 2020年第5期14-22,127,共10页 Journal of Hubei University of Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BJL098)。
关键词 碳交易政策 企业利润 环境质量 国家福利 carbon emission trading policy corporate profit environment quality social welfare
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献123

  • 1杨健儿,郑祥民,周立旻.排污权交易:实现控制SO_2污染的有效途径[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(S1):219-222. 被引量:5
  • 2丁志刚,徐琪.供应链实施低碳技术的博弈与激励机制研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,16(4):13-17. 被引量:15
  • 3张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):35-44. 被引量:5561
  • 4A. Bernard, A. Haurie, M. Vielleand, L. Vignier, A Twoqevel Dynamic Game of Carbon Emission Trading between Rus- sia, China and Annex B Countries. NCCR-WP4 Working Paper, No. 11, 2002.
  • 5A. D. Ellerman, Annelene Decaux, Analysis of Post Kyoto COe Emissions Trading Using Marginal Abatement Curves. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Report, No. 40, 1998.
  • 6Carolyn Fischer, Combining Rate-P, ased and Cap and Trade Emissions Policies. Discussion Paper 03, May 2003.
  • 7Cason Tim N. , An experimental investigation of the seller incentives in the EPA~s emission trading auction. American F.- conomic Review, Vol. 85, September 1995, pp. 905-922.
  • 8Dales J. A. , Pollutio71, Property and Prices. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968.
  • 9Muller R. , Andrew, Stuart Mestelman, Emission trading with shares and coupons: A laboratory experiment. The EnergyJournal, Vol. 15, No. 2, March 1994, pp. 185-211.
  • 10Neil J. Buckley, Short-Run Implications of Cap and Trade versus Baseline and-Credit Emission Trading Plans: Experimen-tal Evidence. McMaster University Working paper, May 2004.

共引文献347

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部