期刊文献+

创造性审查中“反向教导”的理解与判断 被引量:1

Understanding and Judgment of"Teaching away"in Inventiveness Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在创造性审查中,技术启示的判断一直是至关重要的一步,虽然"反向教导"这一术语未在《专利审查指南》中明确定义和举例,但其仍然对审查实践中创造性的判断产生了较大的影响。本文从"反向教导"的含义出发,结合实际案例,分析和梳理了创造性审查中常见的争辩反向教导的情形,并对是否存在反向教导进行辨析,以期为客观、准确认定技术启示,得出正确的创造性审查结论,提供一些参考和启发。 In the inventiveness examination of the patent application,the judgment of technical inspiration has always been a crucial step.Although the term"teaching away"does not appear in the Guidelines for Patent Examination directly,it still has a significant impact on the examination.In this paper,we combined the meaning of“teaching away”and the actual cases analyzed and sorted out the common situations of controversial about the"teaching away".And then analyzed whether there is"teaching away",in order to help to identify technical inspiration objectively and accurately,and then make right decision about inventiveness in examination and provide some reference and inspiration.
作者 张敏 陈雪妮 ZHANG Min;CHEN Xueni(Patent Examination Cooperation Sichuan Center of the Patent Office,CNIPA,Chengdu 610213)
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2020年第S02期27-31,共5页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 专利 创造性 技术启示 反向教导 patent inventiveness technical inspiration teaching away
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1721 F.2d 1540, 220 USPQ 303 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
  • 2In re Grasselli, 713 F.2d 731,743, 218 USPQ 769, 779 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
  • 3In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 221 USPQ 1125 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
  • 4《专利审查指南》第二部分第四章3.2.1.1节.
  • 5(2012)高行终字第1203号判决.
  • 6《专利审查指南(2010)》第二部分第四章第5.2节.
  • 7In re Gurley, 27 F.3d 551,554, 31 USPQ2d 1130, 1132 (Fed. Cir. 1994).
  • 8In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1471, 43 USPQ2d 1362, 1366 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
  • 9(2011)一中知行初字第2162号.
  • 10沈乐平.创造性中“相反教导”的理解[J].中国发明与专利,2010(4):93-95. 被引量:1

共引文献6

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部