期刊文献+

切口局部浸润麻醉联合镇痛泵术后镇痛在剖宫产产妇中的应用 被引量:2

Local Incision Infiltration Injection Combined with Analgesia Pump Postoperative Analgesia in Pregnant Women after Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨切口局部浸润注射0.5%罗哌卡因联合镇痛泵术后镇痛在剖宫产产妇中的应用效果。方法:回顾性分析200例剖宫产产妇,将采用生理盐水切口浸润联合镇痛泵的100例为对照组,采用切口局部浸润注射0.5%罗哌卡因联合镇痛泵的100例为观察组。比较2组术后恢复情况(下肢肌力恢复时间、术后排气时间、术后排尿时间、首次下床时间)、术后不同时间点泌乳素(PRL)、疼痛(VAS)评分、手术前后疼痛应激相关指标[β-内啡肽(β-EP)、P物质(SP)]变化、不良反应。结果:2组比较,观察组下肢肌力恢复时间[(5.22±1.10)vs(7.24±1.58) h]、术后排气时间[(14.32±3.41)vs(17.85±3.86) h]、术后排尿时间[(23.12±4.74)vs(25.68±4.87) h]、首次下床时间[(20.10±3.89)vs(23.42±5.10) h]短于对照组(P<0.05);术后12 h血清PRL水平[(214.23±15.50)vs(208.87±16.10)μg·L-1]、术后24 h[(304.25±20.12)vs(268.58±18.96)μg·L-1]、术后48 h[(401.25±22.12)vs(368.58±20.10)μg·L-1]高于对照组(P<0.05);术后12 h VAS评分[(2.85±1.10)vs(4.52±1.54)分]、术后24 h[(2.00±0.85)vs(3.41±1.12)分]、术后48 h[(1.35±0.65)vs(1.84±0.95)分]低于对照组(P<0.05);术后12 h血清β-EP水平[(31.24±3.74)vs(28.14±2.85) ng·L-1]、术后24 h[(35.10±4.02)vs(30.12±3.11) ng·L-1]、术后48 h[(39.10±4.58)vs(35.58±3.85) ng·L-1]高于对照组(P<0.05);术后12 h血清SP水平[(7.32±2.24)vs(9.87±2.54)μg·mL-1]、术后24 h[(5.11±1.25)vs(7.10±1.84)μg·mL-1]、术后48 h[(3.54±1.01)vs(5.32±1.32)μg·mL-1]低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组不良反应发生率(13.00%)与对照组(11.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:切口局部浸润注射0.5%罗哌卡因联合镇痛泵术后镇痛可加速产妇术后恢复,促进早期泌乳,降低术后疼痛感,减轻疼痛应激反应,且不良反应少,是剖宫产术后有效镇痛方式。 Objective: To investigate the effect of local incision infiltration injection of 0.5% ropivacaine combined with analgesia pump on postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 200 cases of caesarean section pregnant women admitted. 100 cases of continuous incision infiltration with normal saline combined with analgesia pump were taken as the control group, and 100 cases of local incision infiltration injected with 0.5% ropivacaine combined with analgesia pump were taken as the observation group. Postoperative recovery(lower limb muscle strength recovery time, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative urination time, first time out of bed), prolactin(PRL), pain(VAS) score, pain stress [-endorphin(-EP), substance P(SP)] changes and adverse reactions before and after operation were compared between the two groups. Results: The recovery time of lower limb muscle strength in the observation group, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative urination time, first time out of bed were shorter than those in the control group(P<0.05). VAS scores 12 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The serum PRL levels in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05), 12 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery. The serum-EP levels in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). The serum SP level of the observation group was lower than that of the control group 12 h after surgery, 24 h after surgery, 48 h after surgery than that of the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group(13.00% vs 11.00%) was not statistically significant compared with the control group(P>0.05). Conclusion: The local incision infiltration injection of 0.5% ropivacaine combined with analgesia pump after analgesia can accelerate the recovery after obstetrics, promote early lactation, reduce postoperative pain, reduce pain stress reaction, with fewer adverse reactions. Therefore, it is an effective analgesia method after cesarean section.
作者 李玲 Li Ling(Department of Anesthesiology,The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University)
出处 《长治医学院学报》 2020年第5期362-365,共4页 Journal of Changzhi Medical College
关键词 罗哌卡因 镇痛泵 剖宫产 泌乳素 疼痛应激 不良反应 ropivacaine analgesia pump cesarean section prolactin pain stress adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献60

  • 1Shang H, Yang Y, Tong X, et al. Gum chewing slightly en- hances early recovery from postoperative ileus after cesarean section., results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Perinatol, 2010, 27(5): 387-391.
  • 2Nafisi S. Influence of uterine exteriorization versus in situ re- pair on post-Cesarean maternal pain: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth, 2007, 16(2): 135-138.
  • 3Eslamian L, Jalili Z, Jamal A, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anes- thesia. J Anesth, 2012, 26(3): 334-338.
  • 4Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lum- bar triangle. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(10): 1024-1026.
  • 5OrDonnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatecto- my. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2006, 31(1) : 91.
  • 6Belavy D, Cowlishaw PJ, Howes M, et al. Ultrasound- guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Caesarean delivery. Br J Anaesth, 2009, 103(5): 726-730.
  • 7Lee AJ, Palte HD, Chehade JM, et al. Ultrasound-guided bi- lateral transversus abdominis plane blocks in conjunction with intratheeal morphine for posteesarean analgesia. J Clin Anesth, 2013, 25(6): 475-482.
  • 8Sharkey A, Finnerty O, McDonnell JG. Role of transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2013, 26(3): 268-272.
  • 9Hirose M, Hara Y, Hosokawa T, et al. The effect of postop- erative analgesia with continuous epidural bupivacaine after cesarean section on the amount of breast feeding and infant weight gain. Anesth Analg, 1996, 82(6): 1166-1169.
  • 10McDonnell JG, O~Donnell B, Curley G, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg, 2007, 104(1): 193-197.

共引文献173

同被引文献31

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部