期刊文献+

美国制裁伊朗对国际货物贸易的影响及应对--以美国对伊制裁法案和案例为视角 被引量:8

Impact of United States Economic Sanctions Against Iran on International Trade in Goods and Coping Strategy--From the Perspective of U.S.Sanction Bills and Related Cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来,美国对外经济制裁愈演愈烈,特朗普政府的“美国优先”政策导致单边主义、贸易保护主义抬头。以2018年5月美国宣布重启对伊制裁为信号,美国对伊朗实施了更加全面的经济制裁,对伊制裁法案涉及贸易、金融、航运等多个领域,相关制裁规则直接或间接地影响了国际货物贸易的各个方面,包括支付、保险、货物运输等环节,严重阻碍了国际货物贸易的有序进行。中国企业也不可避免地受到了美国对伊经济制裁的影响,欲维护自身合法利益,中国企业可在制裁规则的框架内,从交易相对人、交易标的物、交易方式、交易时间等交易要素出发,建立完备的合规体系;在国际经贸合同订立过程中,设置“制裁条款”,主动防范制裁风险予以应对。 In recent years,U.S.economic sanctions are getting more and more severe.The Trump administration's“U.S.First”policy has led to the rise of unilateralism and trade protectionism.The re-imposition of the sanctions on Iran in May 2018 is a typical example.U.S.economic sanctions against Iran is more comprehensive,and relevant sanction acts concern trade,finance,shipping and many other fields.Sanctions rules contained therein directly or indirectly affect all aspects of international trade in goods,including payment,transportation of goods,insurance and other trade links,seriously impeding the orderly development of international trade in goods.Chinese enterprises are inevitably affected by U.S.economic sanctions against Iran.To safeguard legitimate interests,Chinese enterprises can establish a complete compliance system by focusing on trading counterparties,trading goods,trading method and time period of trading within the framework of sanctions rules,and set up “sanctions clauses” to avoid being sanctioned.
作者 朱玥 Zhu Yue
出处 《国际经济法学刊》 CSSCI 2020年第4期59-75,共17页 Journal of International Economic Law
基金 2019年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究重点课题“美国经济制裁法律的域外适用与中国对策研究”(19SFB1009)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 美国 伊朗 经济制裁 国际货物贸易 United States Iran Economic Sanctions International Trade in Goods
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献28

  • 1简基松.联合国制裁之定性问题研究[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2005,23(6):89-96. 被引量:9
  • 2简基松.关于单边经济制裁的“司法性”与“合法性”探讨[J].法学,2007(1):80-87. 被引量:21
  • 3EKKEHARD STRAUSS. A Bird in the Hand is Worth Two in the Bush-On the Assumed Legal Nature of the Responsibility to Protect [J]. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2009, 1(3):291-323.
  • 4MATITIIAS VANHULLEBUSCH. Islamic Law and the Responsibility to Protect [J]. Human Rights & International Legal Discourse, 2010, 4(2):203(191-209).
  • 5JUTYA BRUNNeE,STEPHEN J. TOOPE. The Responsibility to Protect and the Use of Force: Building Legality [J]. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2010, 2(3):191-212.
  • 6MEHRDAD PAYANDEH. With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility? The Concept of the Responsibility To Protect Within the Process of International Lawmaking [J]. The Yale Journal of International Law, 2010, 35:508-513(469-516).
  • 7[意大利]安东尼奥·卡塞斯,蔡从燕.国际法(第2版)[M].法律出版社,2009.495.
  • 8REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL. Unilateral economic measures as a means of political and economic coercion a- gainst developing countries(A/68/218, 29 July 2013)[R/OL]. 6. http://documents.un.org/default.asp 2014-12-20.
  • 9曾令良.WTO法在国际法律秩序中的共性与个性[A].邵沙平,余敏友.国际法问题专论[C].武汉大学出版社,2002.120-133.
  • 10联合国秘书长的报告.国家对国际不法行为的责任:国际性法院、法庭和其他机构裁判汇编(A/65/76,30 April 2010 )[R/OL].http://documents.un.org/defauh.asp 2014-10-12,20-21.

共引文献34

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部