期刊文献+

艺术院校大学生英语写作句法复杂度现状 被引量:1

The Current Situation of SyntacticComplexity in English Writings FromStudents of Art Institutes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语写作句法复杂度是衡量英语学习者写作水平的重要指标之一。以艺术院校大学生为研究对象,通过对不同专业学生的英语写作文本进行分析,试图从句法复杂度的三个方面,即T单位长度、子句长度和T单位复杂性比率探究艺术院校大学生英语写作句法复杂度现状,为学习者的英语写作水平的提升和日后的英语教学改革提供借鉴。 Syntactic complexity in English writing is one of the important indicators to measure learners’English writing proficiency.This study takes students of art institutes as research objects and conducts a text analysis on the English writings from students of different majors,trying to explore the current situation of syntactic complexity in English writings from students of art institutes from three aspects,namely words per T-unit,words per clause and clause per T-unit.The study aims to provide reference for the improvement of learners’English writing proficiency and for the future reform of English teaching.
作者 陈瑜 项兰 Chen Yu;Xiang Lan
机构地区 鲁迅美术学院
出处 《外语教育研究》 2020年第3期13-17,共5页 Foreign Language Education & Research
关键词 艺术院校 英语写作 句法复杂度 art institutes English writing syntactic complexity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

  • 1马广惠.中美大学生英语语篇对比修辞分析[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2001,24(6):5-8. 被引量:51
  • 2朱神海,张晓梅.文本长度、T单位长度与英语写作成绩的相关分析及启示——一项基于非英语专业学生英语写作的实证研究[J].桂林师范高等专科学校学报,2006,20(2):117-120. 被引量:4
  • 3Bardovi-Harlig, K. & T. Bofman. 1989. Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11. 17-34.
  • 4Beers, S. & W. Nagy. 2007. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? OL]. http://www. springerlink, com/content/326811575526h8t8 /fulltext. pdf (accessed 05/03/2008).
  • 5Berman, R. & L. Verhoeven. 2002. Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing[J]. Written Language and Literacy 5: 1-43.
  • 6Crowhurst, M. 1980. Syntactic complexity in narration and argument at three grade levels [J].Canadian Journal of Education 5. 6-13.
  • 7Crowhurst, M. 1983. Syntactic complexity and writing quality: A review[J]. Canadian Journal of Education 8: 1-16.
  • 8Faigley, L. 1979. The influence of generative rhetoric on the syntactic maturity and writing effectiveness of college freshmen [J]. Research in the Teaching of English 13: 197-206.
  • 9Flahive, D. &B. Snow. 1980. Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions [A]. In J. Oiler & K. Perkins (eds.). Research in Language Testing[C]. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House. 171-176.
  • 10Homburg, T. 1984. Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? [J]. TESOL Quarterly 18: 87-107.

共引文献250

同被引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部