摘要
伦理审核是保障负责任的医学科学数据共享应用实践的路径之一。对于同一机构除了IRB是否成立专门的数据访问审核委员会存在一定争议。IRB和DAC在医学科学数据共享应用的管理中相互补充,但在职责、审核内容、审核依据和标准均有不同。对于综合医疗机构或专门提供数据服务的机构建议成立专门的DAC。此外,为了适应日益增长的数据共享使用审核工作,建议应探索更加高效的数据共享应用审核机制,并提出了一些潜在可行的建议。
Ethical review is one of the pathways to ensure responsible scientific data sharing practice in healthcare and medicine.There are some disputes about whether need to set up a special Data Access Committee(DAC)except to IRB in a related institute.IRB and DAC are complementary to each other in the management of scientific data sharing practice.However,it is different of their responsibility,review content,decision basis and standards.Suggestions to setting up a DAC was provided for the comprehensive medical institutions and special service institutions and platforms of data sharing.In addition,the author described of the responsibilities of the DAC members in detail.Moreover,the author believed that more efficient review mechanism for data sharing and re-use should be explored in order to adapt to the growing data sharing work;and some potential suggestions were also provided.
作者
关健
GUAN Jian(The National Population and Health Scientific Data Centre,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College,Beijing 100730,China)
出处
《中国医学伦理学》
2020年第11期1306-1310,共5页
Chinese Medical Ethics
基金
国家科技基础条件平台中心委托课题“科学数据管理计划等重点领域标准预研”(2020WT04)
科技部重大专项课题“中国遗传资源基础数据库建设”(2019FY100103)。
关键词
数据共享
医学科学数据
数据访问委员会
机构伦理委员会
审核机制
Data Sharing
Scientific Data in Healthcare and Medicine
Data Access Committee
Institutional Review Boards
Review Mechanism