期刊文献+

经尿道前列腺180W直出式绿激光汽化切除术治疗前列腺增生的临床疗效观察 被引量:14

Transurethral 180W front-firing GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估经尿道前列腺180 W直出式绿激光汽化切除术(PVP)治疗BPH的临床疗效和安全性。方法:分析安庆市立医院2019年3~12月61例接受手术治疗的BPH患者的临床资料(对照组31例,接受经尿道前列腺等离子电切术;观察组30例,行经尿道前列腺180 W直出式绿激光汽化切除术),收集两组术前、术中、术后相关临床数据,并对数据进行对比研究。结果:所有患者手术均获成功,未见输血,未见严重并发症。观察组手术时间、术中失血量、术后膀胱灌洗时间、留置尿管时间、术后住院时间均小于对照组[(57.5±19.0)vs(75.0±9.9)min,(48.8±9.6)vs(62.3±15.9)ml,(25.2±11.5)vs(64.4±10.5)h,(2.5±0.5)vs(5.1±0.5)d,(4.1±0.6)vs(7.3±1.7)d],两者比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。术后围手术期并发症方面,术后血尿发生率观察组明显少于对照组[0(0/30)vs 12.9%(4/31)],两者比较具有统计学差异(P<0.05);两组在包膜穿孔、TURS、尿失禁、尿道狭窄及拔管后尿潴留发生率比较无统计学差异。两组术前、术后IPSS、Qol、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿量(PVR)比较有显著统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:经尿道前列腺180 W直出式绿激光汽化切除术治疗前列腺增生,与经尿道等离子电切术相比较更安全有效,但绿激光汽化切除术出血更少,留置尿管时间更短,恢复更快。遇有服用抗凝血药物者无需停药,特别适合高龄、高危前列腺增生患者。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of transurethral 180 W front-firing GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate(PVP)in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods:A total of 61 BPH patients underwent 180 W front-firing GreenLight laser PVP(n=30,the PVP group)or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate(n=31,the control group)from March to December 2019.We collected the pre-,intra-and post-operative clinical data and compared them between the two groups of patients.Results:Operations were successfully completed in all the cases with no blood transfusion or serious complications.Compared with the controls,the patients of the PVP group showed remarkably less intra-operative blood loss([62.3±15.9]vs[48.8±9.6]ml,P<0.05),shorter operation time([75.0±9.9]vs[57.5±19.0]min,P<0.05),postoperative bladder lavage time([64.4±10.5]vs[25.2±11.5]h,P<0.05),catheter-indwelling time([5.1±0.5]vs[2.5±0.5]d,P<0.05)and hospitalization time([7.3±1.7]vs[4.1±0.6]d,P<0.05),and a lower incidence of postoperative hematuria(12.9%[4/31]vs 0%[0/30],P<0.05).No statistically significant differences,however,were found between the two groups in the incidence rates of capsular perforation,transurethral resection syndrome(TURS),urinary incontinence,urethral stricture and post-extubation urinary retention.Significant improvement was observed in IPSS,QOL,Qmax and PVR in both groups post-operatively(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate,180 W front-firing GreenLight laser PVP,with the advantages of less bleeding,shorter catheter-indwelling time and faster recovery,is safer and more effective for the treatment of BPH,with no need for drug withdrawal for those taking anticoagulants,and especially applicable to the elderly and high-risk patients.
作者 汪群锋 梁朝朝 朱劲松 陈志洁 戴宇红 鲍彤 WANG Qun-feng;LIANG Chao-zhao;ZHU Jin-song;CHEN Zhi-jie;DAI Yu-hong;BAO Tong(Department of Urology,Anqing Municipal Hospital/Anqing Hospital Affiliated to Auhui Medical Univrsity,Anqing,Anhui 246003,China;Department of Urolog,The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical Univrsity,Hefei,Anhui 230032,China)
出处 《中华男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第9期793-797,共5页 National Journal of Andrology
关键词 良性前列腺增生 直出式绿激光 经尿道前列腺等离子电切术 经尿道前列腺绿激光汽化切除术 benign prostatic hyperplasia front-firing GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献50

  • 1洪宝发,符伟军,杨勇,蔡伟,高江平,张磊,宋涛,陈耀富.选择性绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗前列腺增生症[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(5):430-431. 被引量:12
  • 2单玉喜,薛波新,崔勇,高洁,阳东荣,孙传洋,王文炯.绿激光光气化术治疗良性前列腺增生[J].江苏医药,2006,32(6):516-518. 被引量:15
  • 3俞斌,王忠.良性前列腺增生微创治疗进展[J].中华男科学杂志,2007,13(8):739-743. 被引量:18
  • 4Barber NJ, Muir GH. High-power KTP laser prostatectomy: The new challenge to transurethral resection of the prostate. Curt Opin Urol, 2004, 14(1) : 21-25.
  • 5Sountoulides P, Tsakiris P. The evolution of KTP laser vaporiza- tion of the prostate. Yonsei Meal J, 2008, 49(2) : 189-199.
  • 6Malek RS, BalTett DM, Kuntzman RS. High-power potassium-ti- tanyl-phosphate ( KTP/532 ) laser vaporization prostatectomy : 24 hours later. Urology, 1998, 51(2) : 254-256.
  • 7A1-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP, et al. GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the pros- tate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol, 2010, 58 (3) : 349-355.
  • 8Teng J, Zhang D, Li Y, et al. Photoselective vaporization with the green light laser vs transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia: A systematic review and rec- ta-analysis. BJU Int, 2013, 111 (2) : 312-323.
  • 9Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, et aL GreenLight laser vaporiza- tion of the prostate: Single-center experience and long-term re- suits after 500 procedures. Eur Urol, 2008, 54(4) : 893-901.
  • 10Hwang CH, Cho CK, Lee YK, et al. Comparative analysis of short-term efficacy and complication of photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia which was classified by prostate size. Korean J Urol, 2007, 48(8) : 826-831.

共引文献98

同被引文献154

引证文献14

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部