期刊文献+

血清游离轻链不同定量检测方法的应用研究进展

Advances in the Application of Different Quantitative Detection Methods For Serum Free Light Chain
原文传递
导出
摘要 血清游离轻链(serum free light chain, sFLC)是浆细胞异常增生的标志物,其水平的升高是肿瘤负荷及疾病变化的重要依据,国际骨髓瘤工作组(International Myeloma Working Group, IMWG)已将sFLC纳入浆细胞肿瘤诊断的最新指南。目前定量检测sFLC的方法主要有5种,包括Freelite■试验(英国Binding Site公司)、血清游离轻链酶联免疫吸附试验(法国西比亚公司)、血清游离轻链测定试验(美国Diazyme公司)、N Latex血清游离轻链测定试验(德国西门子公司)以及Seralite■试验(法国西比亚公司),但在患者的随访中以上方法不可交替使用,且国际上目前尚未明确指示应选用何种方法。因此,认识不同检测方法的性能、优缺点及其在疾病中的应用尤为重要。 Serum free light chains(sFLC) are markers of plasma cell dysplasia, and their elevation is an important basis for tumor load and disease changes. The International Myeloma Working Group(IMWG) has included sFLC in the latest guidelines for the diagnosis of plasma cell tumors. At present, there are five main methods for the determination of sFLC, including Freelite■ assay(The Binding Site Group Ltd,Brimingham,UK), sFLC ELISA assay(Sebia,Evry,France), sFLC assay(Diazyme Laboratories Inc., Poway CA, USA), N Latex sFLC assay(Siemens Healthineers Diagnostics GmbH, Marburg, Germany), and Seralite■ assay(Abingdon Health-Sebia,Evry, France). However, many studies have shown that the above methods cannot be used interchangeantly in the follow-up of patients, and there is no clear indication on which method should be used internationally.Therefore, it is particularly important to know the performance, advantages and disadvantages of different detection methods and their application in diseases.
作者 何媛 周涛 苏婷 李海涛 HE Yuan;ZHOU Tao;SU Ting;LI Hai-Tao(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming 650101,China)
出处 《中国药物经济学》 2020年第9期123-128,共6页 China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics
基金 昆明医科大学2019年研究生创新基金项目(2019S173)。
关键词 游离轻链 定量检测 意义未明的丙种球蛋白病 冒烟型骨髓瘤 多发性骨髓瘤 Free light chains Quantitative testing Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Smoldering myeloma Multiple myeloma
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献50

  • 1康红,王兰兰.免疫比浊法中钩状效应的防范[J].国外医学(临床生物化学与检验学分册),2004,25(6):551-552. 被引量:8
  • 2International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol, 2003,121: 749-757.
  • 3Blade J, Samson D, Reece D, et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietie stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol, 1998, 102: 1115- 1123.
  • 4Bradwell AR. Serum free light chain analysis . 2nd ed. Birmingham: The binding site Ltd. , 2004: 13-21.
  • 5Bradwell AR. Serum free light chain analysis. 2nd ed. Birmingham: The binding site Ltd. , 2004: 49-60.
  • 6Bradwell AR. Serum free light chain measurements move to center stage. Clin Chem, 2005, 51:805-807.
  • 7Katzmann JA, Clark RJ, Abraham RS, et al. Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free kappa and free lambda immunoglobulin light chains: relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains. Clin Chem, 2002, 48 : 1437-1444.
  • 8Duri BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 2006, 20, 1467-1473.
  • 9Drayson M, Tang LX, Drew R, et al. Serum free light-chain measurements for identifying and moritoring patients with nonseretory multiple myeloma. Blood, 2001, 97: 2900-2902.
  • 10Blade J, Kyle RA. Nonsecretory myeloma, immunoglobulin D myeloma, and plasma cell leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 1999, 13: 1259-1272.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部