对知识产权未在《民法典》独立成编的检视与反思--论知识产权法体系化与《民法典》的连接

Examination and Reflection on the Intellectual Property not Included in Civil Code as an Independent Composition:On the Connection of Intellectual Property Law Systematization and Civil Code

知识产权是私权,是民事权利的重要组成部分,理应在民法典中得到体系性的安排。然而,由于目前知识产权本身的体系化尚未构建成熟,以致我国现行民法典无法实现私权体系化的立法目标。从长远看,经历了碎片化、类型化研究后的知识产权,实现其自身体系化具有发展上的必然性。然而现有的“先入典后成典”策略或单独“成典”策略,因其逻辑及实践上仍有待商榷,故不适合指导我国知识产权体系化与民法现代化的前途。依可行之见,我国未来知识产权体系化的构建应依现行《民法典》第123条规定,以其自身体系化、法典化为先行,然后再图谋“成编入典”的现代民法私权体系化大局。

This paper tries to depend on the time of the PRC civil code being compiled to systematize intellectual property to be the intellectual property subseries of civil code.However,the systematization of intellectual property law has not been completed yet,therefore,the mission of the modern system of private rights in civil code cannot be completed at present.It is inevitable to realize the systematization of intellectual property law after the study of fragmentation and typology,however,because the strategy of“first into civil code,then to be independent code”or“straight to be independent code”should continue to be researched both in logic and practice,we cannot depend them to guide the future of the systematization of intellectual property law and the modernization of civil law.As far as practicable,the systematic construction of China’s future intellectual property law should be based on the current article 123 of the general principles of civil law,which should depend on its own systematization and codification,and then attempt to be“independent subseries of civil code”to achieve the trend of systematization of private rights in the modernization of civil law.