学术迹与F1000因子二维视角下学者学术影响力评价研究

Study on the Evaluation of Academic Influence of Scholars based on Academic Trace and F1000 Score

针对目前我国学者评价中多使用论文数量与引用指标,忽略研究质量的不足,探究一套可用于学者学术影响力评价的方法体系,为开展学者学术影响力评价提供参考与借鉴。使用学者发表学术论文这一载体,以代表学者论文影响力与传播力的学术迹指标和代表研究质量的F1000因子指标,综合构建学术影响力战略坐标图。将2013和2014年25位生物医学领域获得国家自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目的学者作为研究对象,分析学者获资助前、资助后以及资助前后在学术影响力战略坐标图中的位置与变化情况,根据学者在学术影响力战略坐标图中分布,分为“全能型”、“创新型”、“潜力型”和“影响型”四类学者。资助前后,不同学者的学术影响力变化方向不同。“全能型”和“创新型”学者占比较低,“潜力型”和“影响型”学者数量相当,占比较高,说明研究内容的创新性仍有较大提升空间。对比仅使用学术迹进行学者学术影响力评价结果发现,学术迹与F1000因子的综合方法可弥补传统评价方式的不足,更具参考价值。未来将扩大研究对象数量与范围,探索不同层次学者学术影响力评价方法。

In view of the fact that the number of papers and citations become the key factors in the evaluation of scholars,but the research quality is ignored.This paper explores a set of methodology for evaluating academic influence,and hopes to provide reference for the subsequent evaluation of scholars.This paper uses academic papers published by scholars as the main output.The academic influence matrix is constructed based on the academic trace and F1000 score comprehensively.The academic trace represents the influence and communication power of scholars,F1000 score represents the quality of research.25 scholars who won the 2013 and 2014 NSFC Distinguished Young Scholars biomedical field were selected as research objects to analyze the distribution and change of academic influence.According to the distribution of scholars in the strategic coordinate chart of academic influence,there are four types of scholars:Omnipotent,Innovative,Potential and Influential.The change direction of scholars is different after funding.No matter before or after the funding,“Omnipotent”and“Innovative”scholars are relatively scarce,“Potential”and“Influence”scholars are more distributed,which shows that the research quality needs to be improved urgently.It is also found that the comprehensive method can make up for the dificiency of traidtional evaluation method of academic track and has more reference value.We will expand the number and scope of scholars and explore evaluation methods of academic influence of scholars at different levels.