期刊文献+

普通高考美术专业统考评价体系研究 被引量:1

Research on the Unified Examination Evaluation System of the Art Major of the General College Entrance Examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 普通高考美术统考是高校美术类专业选拔人才的重要工具和手段,但现有的美术统考评价体系还停留在20世纪美术高考制度构建之初,十分机械固化。不同的美术专业用单一的技能考试进行考核,考试内容和形式严重滞后于现当代美术知识体系,评价标准忽视了对学生动手实践能力、创新能力、思维方式等多模式的考察,这样的评价体系很难选拔出杰出艺术人才。文章通过对其他国家美术考试现状的考察,在考虑中国国情的前提下,有选择地借鉴其他国家美术考试制度中的可取之处,为中国的美术专业考试制度的改革和探索提供宝贵经验,努力建立科学合理的评价体系,并对考核内容和形式、考核评价标准、评卷方式等方面提出整改建议。 The art college entrance examination for the general college entrance examination is an important tool and means for the selection of talents for art majors in colleges and universities.According to the research,the art college entrance examination fever has become a common social phenomenon,but the existing art college entrance examination evaluation system still stays in the art entrance examination system of the last century At the beginning of construction,it was very mechanically cured.Different art majors are evaluated with a single skill test,and the content and form of the exam seriously lag behind the modern and contemporary art knowledge system.The evaluation standard ignores the multi-mode investigation of students'practical ability,innovation ability,thinking mode,etc.It is difficult to select outstanding artistic talents.By examining the current situation of art examinations in other countries and considering the national conditions of our country,we can selectively draw on the merits of the art examination system in other countries to provide valuable experience for the reform and exploration of the art examination system in China.Efforts should be made to establish a scientific and reasonable evaluation system,and put forward rectification suggestions for the content and form of evaluation,evaluation criteria,and assessment methods.
作者 蒋多妮 于肖飞 Jiang Duo-ni;Yu Xiao-fei(Hunan University of Technology and Business,Changsha,Hunan,410000)
出处 《湖南包装》 2020年第5期151-154,共4页
基金 湖南省教育科学“十三五”规划2018年度教育考试研究专项课题(编号:XJK018JKB013)。
关键词 美术高考 现状分析 评价体系 整改建议 Art College Entrance Examination Status Analysis Evaluation System Rectification Suggestions
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献4

共引文献3

同被引文献17

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部