期刊文献+

血清CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R对化疗后卵巢癌患者预后预测价值研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨血清CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R水平预测化疗后卵巢癌患者预后的价值。方法:接受辅助化疗的卵巢癌患者48例为观察组,以同期健康体检妇女41例为对照组,观察组予以紫杉醇+铂类药物行常规化疗。对照组入组后、观察组化疗前及化疗2个疗程后检测血清CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R水平。根据随访结局将观察组患者分为预后不良组和预后良好组,比较各组治疗前后CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R水平,采用ROC曲线法分析各指标的预测效能。结果:观察组治疗前CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R分别为273.08±48.19 U/mL,2.26±0.51 U/mL和453.06±80.74 ng/mL,高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗后CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R较治疗前下降,分别为93.51±29.14 U/mL,0.87±0.23 U/mL和294.56±75.81 ng/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。预后不良组治疗前CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R水平分别为302.18±60.04 U/mL,2.41±0.66 U/mL和472.09±102.13 ng/mL,高于预后良好组的248.03±49.15 U/mL,1.84±0.53 U/mL和409.38±95.72 ng/mL,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后预后不良组CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R水平分别为118.25±33.04 U/mL,1.29±0.33 U/mL和342.91±84.06 ng/mL,预后良好组分别为83.15±27.18 U/mL,0.78±0.21 U/mL和270.68±69.15 ng/mL,两组均较治疗前下降,但预后良好组较预后不良组更低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC分析显示,CA125预测化疗后卵巢癌患者预后不良cut-off值为263.19 U/mL,TNF-αcut-off值为1.95 U/mL,SIL-2R cut-off值为431.06 ng/mL,联合检测预测预后的灵敏度为93.10%,特异度为89.47%,高于各指标单独检测。结论:卵巢癌患者血清CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R水平高于健康人群,化疗后上述指标明显下降,联合检测CA125、TNF-α及SIL-2R对化疗后卵巢癌患者预后有较高的预测价值。
作者 王娜 王改梅
出处 《交通医学》 2020年第5期511-513,516,共4页 Medical Journal of Communications
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1仲建新,曹新平,王迪,张弘,丁润生,姜胜华,江枫,姚微,黄华,史锦云.醋酸甲羟孕酮增强顺铂对人卵巢癌耐药细胞抗癌作用的研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2007,16(8):594-598. 被引量:9
  • 2Braicu El, Fotopoulou C, Van Gorp T, et al. Preoperative HEal ex- pression in plasma predicts surgical outcome in primary ovarian cancer patients:results fi'om the OVCAD study [J]. Gynecol On-col,2012,128:245-251.
  • 3Angioli R, Plotti F, Capriglione S, et al. Can the preoperative HE4 level predict optimal eytoreduction in patients with ad- vanced ovarian carcinoma? [J].Gyneco] Oncol,2013,128:579- 583.
  • 4Angioli R, Capriglione S, Aloisi A, et al. Can HE4 predict plati- num response during first-line chemotherapy in ovarian can- cer?[J].Tumour Biol,2014,35(7):7009-7015.
  • 5Xu L, Cai J, Yang Q, et al. Prognostic significance of several bio- markers in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of pub- lished studies [J ]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2013, 139(8): 1257- 1277.
  • 6Cai J, Xu L, Tang H, et al. The role of the PTEN/PI3K/Akt path- way on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta- analy- sis [J ]. Oncologist, 2014, 19(5):528-535.
  • 7Cao J, Cai J, Huang D, et al. miR-335 represents an indepen- dent prognostic marker in epithelial ovarian cancer [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2014,141(3):437-442.
  • 8Lee H, Park CS, Deftereos G, et al. MicroRNA expression in ovarian carcinoma and its correlation with clinicopathological features[J]. World J Surg Oncol,2012,10:174.
  • 9Nam EJ, Yoon H, Kim SW, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles in serous ovarian carcinoma [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2008, 14: 2690-2695.
  • 10Davidson B, Trop CG, Reich R.The clinical and diagnostic role of microRNAs in ovarian carcinoma [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 133(3):640-646.

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部