期刊文献+

腹腔镜下乙状结肠、直肠肿瘤手术吻合口瘘137例临床分析 被引量:1

Clinical Analysis of 137 Cases of Anastomotic Leakage Under Laparos copic Surgery for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Tumors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤患者使用腹腔镜手术进行治疗的疗效进行观察。方法对该次研究在2014年7月—2019年9月所选择的137例乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤患者使用腹腔镜手术进行治疗的相关临床资料进行回顾性分析,对患者手术成功的结果、具体的手术情况进行观察。结果 131例手术获成功,手术成功率为95.6%;6例中转开腹,所占比例为4.6%;成功手术中34例行结肠造瘘,所占比例为25.9%;97例行Ⅰ期吻合保留肛门,所占比例为74.1%;其中10例发生术后出现吻合口瘘现象。术后行Ⅰ期吻合患者吻合口瘘发生率为10.3%。结论使用腹腔镜手术对乙状结肠和直肠肿瘤手术进行治疗安全性较高,对患者身体造成的伤害较小,且具有比开腹根治术更好的短期效果。 Objective To explore the clinical experience of laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid and rectal tumors.Methods 137 cases of laparoscopic operation for sigmoid colon and rectum tumors were retrospectively analyzed from July 2014 to September 2019.Outcome measures:the outcome of successful operation and the specific operation conditions were observed.Results 131 cases were successful,the probability of success was 95.6%.6 cases were transferred to laparotomy,accounting for 4.6%.Among the successful operations,34 underwent colostomy,accounting for 25.9%.97 routineⅠstage anastomosis retain the anus,the proportion is 74.1%;anastomotic fistula occurred in 10 cases.Patients with postoperative lineⅠmatch the incidence of anastomotic fistula was 10.3%.Conclusion Laparoscopic operation of sigmoid colon and rectum is safe and feasible,with less trauma,quick recovery of patients,and better short-term effect than laparotomy.
作者 王勤 顾文斌 左燕 羊平 WANG Qin;GU Wen-bin;ZUO Yan;YANG Ping(Department of General Surgery,Kunming Hospital of Yunnan Province(The Fourth People's Hospital of Kunming),Kunming,Yunnan Province,650302 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2020年第21期89-91,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 腹腔镜手术 结直肠肿瘤 吻合口瘘 Laparoscopic surgery Colorectal tumors Anastomotic fistula
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献55

  • 1潘贻飞,张筱骅,叶国华,林包荣,贾新建,王欧晨,周素梅.腹膜外斜隧道式结肠造口预防造口旁疝[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(4):259-259. 被引量:8
  • 2陆艳军,吴彦,魏小川,周宗进,刘学礼.经腹膜外外翻式结肠造口在Miles术的临床应用[J].临床外科杂志,2004,12(12):780-781. 被引量:3
  • 3邱磊,谢沛标,廖健南,廖一平.直肠癌腹膜外乙状结肠造口术20例临床分析[J].中国医师杂志,2006,8(12):1674-1675. 被引量:5
  • 4Kasparek MS, Hassan I, Cima RR, et al. Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer[ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum,2012,55 (2) : 147-154.
  • 5Kasparek MS, Hassan I, Cima RR, et al. Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: sphincter preservation vs quality of life [ J ]. Colorectal Dis, 2011,13 (8) :872-877.
  • 6Kim JS, Hur H, Kim NK, et al. Oncologic outcomes after radical sur- gery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced lower rectal cancer: abdominoperineal resection versus sphincter-pre- serving procedure[ J]. Ann Surg Onco1,2009,16 ( 5 ) : 1266-1273.
  • 7Lian L, Wu XR, He XS, et al. Extraperitoneal vs. intraperitoneal route for permanent colostomy : a meta-analysis of 1071 patients [ J ]. Int J Coloreetal Dis,2012,27 ( 1 ) :59-64.
  • 8Dong LR, Zhu YM, Xu Q, et al. Clinical evaluation of extraperitoneal colostomy without damaging the muscle layer of the abdominal wall [J]. J Int Mcd Res,2012,40(4) :1410-1416.
  • 9郑民华.我国腹腔镜结直肠外科的发展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2010,15(6):401-403. 被引量:43
  • 10陈仕才,宋新明,陈志辉,李明哲,何裕隆,詹文华.肠系膜下动脉结扎方式对乙状结肠癌和直肠癌患者预后影响的Meta分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13(9):674-677. 被引量:30

共引文献53

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部