期刊文献+

ON INDISPENSABLE PREMISES FOR CHINESE CITIZENS TO INITIATE CIVIL PUBLIC INTEREST LAWSUITS 被引量:1

论我国公民提起民事公益诉讼的必要前提
原文传递
导出
摘要 In the light of the judicial practice data in recent years,the three authorized case-filing entities(the related administrations,non-governmental organizations and the people’s procuratorates)have failed to provide adequate and thorough litigation protection for the relevant public interests.Under the joint influence of‘government failure’,‘voluntary failure’,‘market failure’and‘legal institution failure’,for the cause of providing better and more sufficient protection for civil public interests,our legislators should reserve opportunities and leeway for citizens to file those types of litigations.Moreover,as a matter of fact,citizens have already made full use of the existing system to file cases involving public welfare to the people’s courts and ultimately prevailed in their trials. 就近年来的司法实践数据看,我国现有的三类被授权提起诉讼的主体(法定机关、法定社团及人民检察院)对相关民事公益的诉讼保护均缺乏充分性。在"政府失灵""、志愿失灵""、市场失灵"及"法律制度失灵"的共同影响下,为使民事公益得到更好及更充分的保护,我国立法者理应为公民个人提起此类诉讼保留机会和余地。事实上,我国公民已充分利用现有制度,向人民法院提起牵涉公益的诉讼,并最终获得了胜诉裁判。
作者 Du Wen 杜闻(Civil,Commercial and Economic Law School of China University of Political Science&Law)
机构地区 Civil
出处 《China Legal Science》 2020年第6期54-78,共25页 中国法学(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献125

  • 1汤维建.公益诉讼的主体资格[J].中国审判,2012(6):29-31. 被引量:6
  • 2赵红梅.有关消费者公益诉讼的三个关键性问题[J].中国审判,2013(6):29-31. 被引量:19
  • 3蔡守秋.环境权初探[J].中国社会科学,1982(3):29-39. 被引量:190
  • 4李希慧,廖梅.我国刑法立法解释性质问题探讨[J].法学,2004(8):55-61. 被引量:11
  • 5李拥军.论权利的生成[J].学术研究,2005(8):79-83. 被引量:35
  • 6朱英.近代中国的“社会与国家”:研究回顾与思考[J].江苏社会科学,2006(4):176-185. 被引量:23
  • 7翟小波.“软法”及其概念之证成——以公共治理为背景[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2007,25(2):3-10. 被引量:112
  • 8This is the view of Donald Black, American legal behaviorist. See Shilun Lii ed.,现代西方法学流派 (Modern Western Law Theory), vol. II, Encyclopedia of China Publishing House (Beijing), at 848 (2000).
  • 9最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国婚姻法》若干问题的解释(三) [The Interpretation (III) of the Supreme Court on Several Issues Regarding the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China].
  • 10The Supreme Court of China published the draft of the Interpretation (III) in its official website and in the press to solicit public comments between November 15 and December 15, 2010. The draft aroused great attention and wide discussions. The Supreme Court received 9974 comments and 181 letters. The 17 institutes, including the Marriage Law Committee of the China Law Society, held a seminar and made written revisions to the draft. See Jungong Sun, the spokesman of the Supreme Court, 关于《最高人民法院关于适用<中华人民共和国婚姻法>若干问题的解释(三)》的新闻发布稿 (News Release Concerning the Interpretation (III) of the Supreme Court on Several Issues Regarding the Application of the Marriage Law of the People's Republic of China), at http://www.court.gov.cn/xwzx/xwfbh/twzb/201108/t2011 0812 159534.htm (last visited Dec. 29, 2011).

共引文献250

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部