摘要
目的:分析在实施尿液潜血检验的过程中尿液分析仪的临床应用价值。方法:本次研究对象的纳入时间在2019年1月~2020年1月,包括尿潜血检验的患者140例,所有患者均给予尿液分析仪检验和显微镜红细胞计数检验,对比两种检验方法的准确性。结果:对两种检验方法检验敏感度、特异性、误诊率、漏诊率进行统计学分析可知,显微镜红细胞计数与尿液分析仪无明显差异,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在实施尿液潜血检验时尿液分析仪和显微镜红细胞计数均为较为常用的检验方法,这两种方法各自具有自己的优势和不足,在实际的临床应用过程中可以针对性的进行选择,同时为了达到互补的效果,提高检验的准确率也可以联合运用两种检验方法,为临床提供更加准确的检验结果。
Objective:To analyze the clinical application value of urine analyzer in the process of carrying out urine occult blood test.Methods:The subjects of this study were included between January 2019 and January 2020,including 140 patients with occult urine blood test.All patients were tested with urine analyzer and red blood cell count test under microscope,comparing the two test methods accuracy.Results:Statistical analysis of the sensitivity,specificity,misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate of the two test methods showed that there was no significant difference between the red blood cell count microscope and urine analyzer,which was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:When implementing urine occult blood test urine analyzer and microscope red blood cell count is relatively commonly used inspection method,the two methods have their respective advantages and disadvantages,in the actual clinical application process can be targeted for choice,at the same time in order to achieve complementary effect,improve the inspection accuracy can also be combined use of two kinds of inspection methods,for clinical provides more accurate test results.
作者
田瑞丽
TIAN Rui-li(Department of Laboratory Medicine,People's Hospital of Baodi District,Tianjin,Tianjin 301800)
出处
《中国医疗器械信息》
2020年第22期95-96,117,共3页
China Medical Device Information
关键词
尿液分析仪
显微镜红细胞计数
尿液潜血检验
敏感度
特异性
urine analyzer
red blood cell count under microscope
urine occult blood test
sensitivity
specificity