双元威权领导对员工建言行为的影响机制研究被引量：10

Research on the Influence Mechanism of Dual Authoritarian Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文基于双元理论,通过对385名员工的调研数据,检验了双元威权领导(专权领导和尚严领导)对员工建言行为的影响。研究结果表明:(1)专权领导对员工建言行为具有显著负向影响,尚严领导对员工建言行为具有显著正向影响;(2)权力感知在双元威权领导(专权领导和尚严领导)与员工建言行为关系间起到了中介作用;(3)人际敏感特质正向调节权力感知与员工建言行为之间的关系;(4)同时,人际敏感特质调节了权力感知的中介作用。本文研究有助于扩展员工建言的研究视野,同时对于提升员工建言的积极性具有一定的指导意义。 Based on the dual theory,this paper examines the influence of dual authoritarian leadership(authoritarian leadership and strict leadership)on employee voice behavior through the survey data of 385 employees.The results show that:(1)authoritarian leadership has a negative impact on employee voice behavior,and strict leadership has a positive impact on employee voice behavior;(2)power perception mediates the relationship between dual authoritarian leadership(authoritarian leadership and strict leadership)and employee voice behavior;(3)interpersonal sensitivity positively moderates the relationship between power perception and employee voice behavior;(4)at the same time,interpersonal sensitivity moderates the mediating role of power perception.This study helps expand the research vision of employee voice,and has a certain guiding significance to enhance employee voice behavior.

作者张兰霞孙琪恒 ZHANG Lan-xia;SUN Qi-heng(School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China;School of Economics and Management, Yingkou Institute of Technology, Yingkou 115014, China)

机构地区东北大学工商管理学院营口理工学院经济管理学院

出处《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第6期10-16,共7页 Forecasting

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(7120036)。

关键词双元威权领导权力感知人际敏感特质员工建言行为 dual authoritarian leadership power perception interpersonal sensitivity employee voice behavior

分类号 F272.92 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1王永跃,葛菁青,柴斌锋.伦理型领导影响员工建言的多重中介效应比较研究[J].心理科学,2017,40(3):692-698. 被引量：8
2容琰,杨百寅,隋杨.权力感对员工建言行为的影响——自我验证机制的作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(10):119-129. 被引量：16

二级参考文献50

1Morrison E W, See K E, Pan C. An approach-inhibi- tion model of employee silence: The joint effects of personal sense of power and target openness[J]. Person- nel Psychology, 2015,68(3):547-580.
2Galinsky A D, Gruenfeld D H, Magee J C. From po- wer to action[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 2003,85(3):453-466.
3Galinsky A D, Rucker D D, Magee J C. Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions // Mikulincer M, Shaver P R, Simpson J A, et al. APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Vol 3 Interpersonal Relations[M]. Washington: American Psy- chological Association, 2015.
4Wojciszke B, Struzynska-Kujalowicz A. Power influen- ces self-esteem[J]. Social Cognition, 2007,25(4):472-494.
5Fast N J, Sivanathan N, Mayer N D, et al. Power and overconfident decision-making[J]. Organizational Beha- vior and Human Decision Processes, 2012,117(2):249- 260.
6Duguid M M, Goncalo J A. Living large the powerful overestimate their own height[J]. Psychological Science, 2012,23(1):36-40.
7Swann W B J. Self-verification theory // Van Lange P A M, Kruglanski A W, Higgins E T. Handbook of Theo- ries of Social Psychology[M]. London: Sage Pulication Ltd., 2012.
8Pierce J L, Gardner D G, Cummings L L, et al. Orga- nization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measure- ment, and validation[J]. Academy of Management Jour- nal, 1989,32(3):622-648.
9Pierce J L, Gardner D G. Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the orga- nization-based self-esteem literature[J]. Journal of Man- agement, 2004,30(5):591-622.
10Crant J M. Proactive behavior in organizations[J]. Jour- nal of Management, 2000,26(3):435-462.