期刊文献+

硼替佐米治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤期间心脏不良事件的影响因素及其对生存时间影响的真实世界研究 被引量:15

Associated Factors and Outcome of Cardiac Adverse Events in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Bortezomib:a Real-world Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种易发生于老年群体的血液系统肿瘤,随着人口老龄化其发病率逐渐升高。随着硼替佐米等新型靶向药物的广泛应用,MM患者的中位生存期已延长至5~7年。多项个案报道硼替佐米用药期间的心脏不良事件(CAEs)病死率高,鲜见真实世界的影响因素分析。目的分析新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者在应用硼替佐米期间出现CAEs的影响因素及其对生存时间的影响。方法选取2009年1月-2019年1月北京朝阳医院西院血液与肿瘤科收治的NDMM患者164例作为研究对象,以硼替佐米为基础的化疗方案作为一线诱导化疗方案,仅在接受硼替佐米的治疗过程中评估CAEs并分为CAEs组26例,对照组138例。CAEs组中分为急性CAEs亚组(第1疗程过程中出现的CAEs)与非急性CAEs亚组(第2疗程及之后出现的CAEs)。收集比较CAEs组和对照组的临床资料;记录CAEs组患者发生CAEs时硼替佐米的累积剂量以及发生CAEs时的临床表现;分析NDMM患者在应用硼替佐米期间出现CAEs的影响因素及CAEs对生存时间的影响。结果CAEs组年龄﹥65岁、吸烟、心脏病史、高血压史、高危细胞遗传学比例及血清肌酐(Scr)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平高于对照组,血红蛋白(HGB)水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。26例CAEs患者中急性CAEs 14例,非急性CAEs 12例。急性CAEs中位累积剂量为2.7 mg/m^2;非急性CAEs中位累积剂量为20.8 mg/m^2。急性CAEs患者均发生心力衰竭(100.0%),非急性CAEs患者中心力衰竭4例(33.3%),心房颤动4例(33.3%),静脉血栓栓塞2例(16.6%),急性冠脉综合征2例(16.6%)。呼吸困难与心悸为最常见的CAEs症状,其次为水肿和体质量增加。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄≥66岁、吸烟、HGB<76 g/L、Scr≥176μmol/L、LDH≥173 U/L是应用硼替佐米治疗期间发生CAEs的危险因素(P<0.05)。CAEs组与对照组的中位总体生存时间(OS)分别为28、77个月,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=66.563,P<0.01)。急性CAEs与非急性CAEs两亚组中位OS分别为9、36个月,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ^2=7.229,P<0.01)。结论硼替佐米治疗期间出现CAEs的患者预后差,其危险因素为年龄≥66岁、吸烟、HGB<76 g/L、Scr≥176μmol/L、LDH≥173 U/L,急性CAEs生存时间较短。 Background Multiple myeloma(MM)is a hematological malignancy that easily occurs in older adults,whose morbidity increases with aging.The median overall survival of MM patients has been prolonged to 5-7 years largely owing to wide application of bortezomib and other novel targeted drugs.A number of cases have been reported to a high risk of mortality following cardiac adverse events(CAEs)during bortezomib treatment,but related real-world studies of the influencing factors are rare.Objective To explore the associated factors and outcome of CAEs in newly diagnosed MM patients with bortezomib.Methods In this retrospective study,164 newly diagnosed MM patients who were admitted to the Department of Hematology and Oncology,Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital(West),Capital Medical University from January 1,2009 to January 31,2019 were enrolled,and received bortezomib-based chemotherapy as the induction chemotherapy.During bortezomib treatment,26 with CAEs and 138 without were assigned to CAEs group〔including 14 had CAEs during the first treatment course(acute CAEs subgroup),and 12 had CAEs in the second or subsequent treatment course(non-acute CAEs subgroup)〕and control group,respectively.Clinical data of CAEs and control groups were collected and compared.The cumulative dose of bortezomib and clinical manifestations when CAEs occurred were recorded.Factors associated with CAEs were explored.The survival following CAEs was analyzed.Results Compared with control group,CAEs group had a higher proportion of patients aged over 65,or higher proportion of smokers,patients with a history of heart disease,hypertension,or high-risk cytogenetics(P<0.05).CAEs group also showed higher mean levels of Scr and LDH and lower mean HGB(P<0.05).The median cumulative dose of bortezomib for acute and non-acute CAEs patients was 2.69 mg/m^2,and 20.8 mg/m^2,respectively.Heart failure(100.0%)occurred in all patients with acute CAEs,while in non-acute CAEs subgroup there were 4 cases of heart failure(33.3%),4 cases of atrial fibrillation(33.3%),2 cases of venous thrombosis(16.6%),and 2 cases of coronary syndrome(16.6%).Dyspnea and palpitation were the most common symptoms of CAEs,followed by edema and increased body weight.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age≥66,smoking,HGB<76 g/L,Scr≥176μmol/L and LDH≥173 U/L were independently associated with increased risk of CAEs during bortezomib treatment(P<0.05).The mean overall survival of the CAEs group and control group was 28 and 77 months,respectively,showing a significant difference(χ^2=66.563,P<0.01).The mean overall survival of acute CAEs and non-acute CAEs subgroups was 9 and 36 months,respectively,showing a notable difference as well(χ^2=7.229,P<0.01).Conclusion The risk factors for CAEs during bortezomib treatment were age≥66,smoking,HGB<76 g/L,Scr≥176μmol/L and LDH≥173 U/L.Those with CAEs had a poor outcome.In particular,those with acute CAEs had a shorter survival.
作者 申曼 黄仲夏 李新 张佳佳 裴晓姣 潘振宇 陈文明 SHEN Man;HUANG Zhongxia;LI Xin;ZHANG Jiajia;PEI Xiaojiao;PAN Zhenyu;CHEN Wenming(Department of Hematology,Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100043,China;Department of Radiology,Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100043,China;Department of Hematology,Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100020,China)
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS 北大核心 2021年第2期210-218,共9页 Chinese General Practice
基金 北京市科技计划课题(Z171100000417010)——微移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤伴髓外病变的临床研究 北京市石景山区医学重点扶持专科建设项目(20170006)。
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 诊断 硼替佐米 心脏不良事件 危险因素 生存 Multiple myeloma Diagnosis Bortezomib Cardiac adverse events Risk factors Survival
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献75

  • 1托伐普坦临床研究协作组,张健,朱文玲.常规治疗基础上联用托伐普坦片治疗心原性水肿的有效性和安全性的多中心随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究[J].中华心力衰竭和心肌病杂志(中英文),2017,1(1):15-21. 被引量:26
  • 2Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3) : 267-315. DOI: 10. 1016/j. rec. 2015. 10. 009.
  • 3Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain : The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department [ J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. DOI: 10. 1007/s12350-011-9484-7.
  • 4Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. DOI: 10. ll61/CIRCIMAGING. 112. 980797.
  • 5Huhen E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in theemergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 61 (8): 880- 892. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2009. 02. 008.
  • 6Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/l-hour algorithm in the diagnosis ofmyocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [ J ]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-2. DOI: 10. 1016/j. annemergrned. 2015. 11. 013.
  • 7Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16) : 1211-1218. DOI: 10. 1001/archintemmed. 2012. 3698.
  • 8Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20) : 2569-2619. DOI: 10. 1093/eurheartj/ehs215.
  • 9Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should patients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk Derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score [J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. DOI: 10. 1136/bmjopen-2013-O04425.
  • 10Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Iear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222-231. DOI: 10. 1177/2048872612453924.

共引文献5955

同被引文献182

引证文献15

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部